Wisconsin Senate Bill SB1079

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/6/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Proposed rules relating to the development of numerical groundwater quality standards for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, promulgated by the Department of Natural Resources.

Impact

If enacted, SB1079 is expected to facilitate the implementation of necessary regulations governing PFAS concentrations, which are critical to public health and environmental safety. The bill aims to provide a framework for the DNR to establish permanent rules concerning these substances, thus ensuring that Wisconsin's groundwater remains safe for consumption and ecological balance. The introduction of numerical groundwater quality standards is a proactive response to growing concerns about the health risks associated with PFAS exposure, which has garnered attention from various sectors, including health advocates and environmental organizations.

Summary

Senate Bill 1079 is a legislative proposal designed to address groundwater quality standards specifically concerning per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Introduced on March 6, 2024, by Senators Cowles, Wimberger, and Cabral-Guevara, along with Representatives Mursau, O'Connor, and Steffen, the bill seeks to authorize the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to continue with the rule-making process for establishing numerical standards aimed at minimizing the concentration of these contaminants in groundwater. This follows a notification by the DNR regarding a final economic impact analysis (EIA) indicating the proposed rule would exceed significant cost thresholds, which could hinder its implementation without legislative approval.

Contention

The bill may face scrutiny regarding the economic implications of its enforcement. Since the EIA indicated that the proposed groundwater quality rule challenges the $10 million threshold for compliance costs, there is potential for debate on the balance between environmental protection and economic feasibility. Supporters may argue that the need for clean water justifies the costs, while opponents could express concerns over the financial burden it places on local governments and businesses. The complexity of managing these regulations could also lead to discussions about the adequacy of existing frameworks to cope with emerging pollutants like PFAS.