The Public Service Commission's website and an annual report relating to its dockets.
A significant aspect of the bill is its requirement for the PSC to assess and indicate the expected impact of its decisions on public utility costs and, consequently, on ratepayers. Each annual report is to include a section that outlines whether the decision's anticipated effect on costs is likely to be positive, negligible, negative, or mixed. This provision addresses public concerns about utility costs and ensures that the commission remains accountable for its impact on ratepayers, potentially altering the landscape of utility management and oversight.
Senate Bill 647 seeks to enhance transparency and public engagement by mandating the Public Service Commission (PSC) to produce annual reports on its dockets. The bill outlines specific requirements for these reports, including categorization by utility types (investor-owned versus municipal), and the inclusion of detailed information regarding each docket such as docket identification numbers, titles, and the number of public comments received. This information aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the PSC's activities and decisions made over the preceding calendar year.
The bill may encounter points of contention regarding the level of public engagement allowed in the commission's decisions. While it opens a channel for public comments on the opinions expressed in the reports, the report's opinions are strictly for informational purposes and are not binding. Critics might argue that without binding feedback mechanisms, the effectiveness of public engagement could be limited, while supporters contend that the bill represents a significant step towards greater transparency and responsiveness in public utility governance.