Wisconsin Senate Bill SB707

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/21/23
• Refer: 11/21/23
• Report Pass: 2/5/24
• Engrossed: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/14/24
• Enrolled: 2/28/24
• Chaptered: 3/26/24
• Passed: 3/26/24

Caption

National reading program grants. (FE)

Impact

If enacted, SB707 would establish a program under statutory section 49.168 that allows the Department to grant reimbursements to eligible nonprofits for costs incurred in purchasing books for young children. The financial support would be capped at 50% of the costs up to a maximum of $10,000 per grant. This could significantly enhance the ability of nonprofit organizations to provide literacy resources in local communities, directly impacting the accessibility of books for young children across diverse socio-economic backgrounds.

Summary

Senate Bill 707 aims to create a framework for awarding grants to nonprofit organizations that participate in national reading programs. These programs, which have been around since at least 2003, focus on mailing age-appropriate books to children from birth to age five without any cost, regardless of family income. The bill is seen as a step towards improving literacy rates among young children in Wisconsin by facilitating access to books and promoting reading from an early age.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB707 seem generally positive, with widespread support for initiatives that aim to bolster childhood literacy. Advocates of the bill highlight the importance of early reading and its long-term benefits on education and community development. However, potential concerns may arise regarding funding distribution and the efficacy of chosen nonprofit partners, indicating a need for oversight in implementation.

Contention

Key points of contention might revolve around the selection criteria for eligible nonprofit organizations and how the allocated grants will be monitored and evaluated. Some stakeholders may express apprehension about ensuring that funds are used effectively to reach the intended demographic, while others advocate strongly for a well-structured process to promote transparency and accountability within the program.