Wisconsin Senate Bill SB892

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/24
• Refer: 1/5/24
• Refer: 2/27/24
• Report Pass: 3/6/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Preemption of certain local animal ordinances.

Impact

If enacted, SB892 would centralize regulatory authority concerning animal facilities within the state of Wisconsin, hindering local jurisdictions' ability to tailor regulations to their specific community needs. The bill's supporters argue that it simplifies the management and regulation of agricultural operations, thereby supporting farmers by providing a uniform regulatory framework. This could be particularly impactful in rural regions where animal farming plays a crucial economic role. Conversely, critics contend that this encroachment on local governance undermines their ability to address specific animal welfare concerns and manage public health risks more effectively in their locales.

Summary

Senate Bill 892 aims to limit the regulatory authority of local governments over animal facilities located in areas exclusively zoned for agricultural use. The bill establishes that political subdivisions are prohibited from setting animal welfare standards that exceed state law, from regulating animal medications or vaccinations beyond state requirements, and from restricting uses or species of animals allowed in these agricultural zones. Additionally, existing local regulations that conflict with these provisions are rendered unenforceable unless they pertain to significant public health or safety concerns.

Contention

The primary points of contention surrounding SB892 stem from its implications for local governance. Advocates for the bill argue that it prevents a fragmented regulatory environment that could burden agricultural operations. In contrast, opponents, including animal rights groups and certain local government officials, raise concerns that the legislation dismisses the importance of local input in animal welfare and safety regulations. They fear that limiting local control could lead to negative impacts on community-specific animal welfare practices and responses to public safety threats effectively siloed by broader state policies.