Wisconsin Senate Bill SB902

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/24
• Refer: 1/11/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Certain preferential treatment by local governments.

Impact

If passed, SB902 would effectively allow local governments to implement policies that could favor individuals based on the aforementioned characteristics. This could lead to a significant shift in employment and contracting practices across municipalities, where previously such actions were restricted. The change aims to possibly address concerns surrounding workforce diversity and inclusion but raises questions regarding equity and fairness in employment opportunities.

Summary

Senate Bill 902 aims to amend the existing statutes regarding the treatment of certain characteristics in employment decisions and public contracting by local governments. Introduced on January 11, 2024, the bill seeks to eliminate the current statutory provision that prohibits local governments from granting preferential treatment based on race, color, ancestry, national origin, or sexual orientation, unless required to secure federal aid. This change is significant in terms of how local governments might manage hiring practices and contractual engagements, potentially allowing for more flexibility in applying such preferences.

Contention

The bill is likely to spark debates concerning the balance between affirmative action policies and efforts to eliminate discrimination. Proponents may argue that the ability to offer preferential treatment will help rectify historical inequalities faced by certain groups. In contrast, opponents could contend that such allowances could perpetuate discrimination against individuals not belonging to the specified groups, undermining equal opportunity principles. The bill touches on sensitive issues related to race and personal identity, making it a potential flashpoint in legislative discussions.

Voting_history

As of the latest updates, there has been no recorded voting history associated with SB902, which indicates it is still in the early stages of legislative consideration. This lack of voting history may change as the bill progresses through committees and potential amendments are discussed.