A nuclear power siting study and time limits for taking final action on certain certificate of public convenience and necessity applications. (FE)
Impact
One significant aspect of AB108 is the amendment related to the timeline for the PSC's actions on applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity (CPCN). Currently, applicants for large electric generating facilities face an uncertain timeline on when their applications will be reviewed. This bill mandates that the PSC must act on such applications involving advanced nuclear technologies within 150 days of determining the application complete, streamlining the approval process. Failing that, the application is deemed approved unless an extension is justified.
Summary
Assembly Bill 108 proposes the conducting of a nuclear power siting study by the Public Service Commission (PSC) in Wisconsin. The primary objective of the bill is to identify potential sites for nuclear power generation, including both existing nuclear and non-nuclear power sites. This initiative aims to pave the way for the development and demonstration of advanced nuclear fission and fusion reactors, thereby potentially strengthening the state's energy portfolio. The bill also outlines the importance of considering federal guidelines, particularly the U.S. Department of Energy's siting studies.
Contention
The introduction of AB108 may spark debate surrounding energy policy in Wisconsin, particularly regarding nuclear energy. Proponents argue that the bill is a proactive step towards embracing clean and efficient energy solutions through advanced nuclear technologies, which could significantly reduce carbon emissions. Conversely, opponents may raise concerns over safety, environmental implications, and the speed at which projects are approved, fearing that rushed assessments could overlook crucial environmental and public safety considerations.
Use of environmental trust bonds to finance the costs of retiring electric generating facilities; integrated resource and reliability planning by electric utilities and cooperatives; closure of large electric generating facilities; and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Use of environmental trust bonds to finance the costs of retiring electric generating facilities; integrated resource and reliability planning by electric utilities and cooperatives; closure of large electric generating facilities; and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Requiring notice to political subdivisions and landowners regarding proposed large solar energy facilities, requirements for applying for certificates for large solar electric generating facilities, joint development agreements related to large solar electric generating facilities, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Requiring notice to political subdivisions and landowners regarding proposed large solar energy facilities, requirements for applying for certificates for large solar electric generating facilities, joint development agreements related to large solar electric generating facilities, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)