Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB124

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/25
• Refer: 3/11/25
• Report Pass: 5/29/25
• Refer: 5/29/25
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

Prohibiting persons who have been convicted of a violent crime from changing their name and providing a penalty.

Impact

The bill introduces significant modifications to existing statutes concerning name changes within the state of Wisconsin. By criminalizing the act of a name change for individuals convicted of violent crimes, it establishes a new legal barrier aimed at maintaining public order and protecting potential victims. Violators of this statute would face penalties classified as Class H felonies, which may deter individuals from seeking to change their names after committing serious offenses. The implications of this bill could lead to increased scrutiny and monitoring of individuals with violent backgrounds, as their identities would remain consistent with their criminal records.

Summary

Assembly Bill 124 aims to enhance public safety by prohibiting individuals convicted of violent crimes from changing their names. The types of violent crimes outlined in the bill include serious offenses such as homicide, battery, kidnapping, stalking, human trafficking, and sexual assault. This legislative action follows existing regulations related to sex offenders, who are already restricted from changing their names during the registration period. By introducing this new prohibition, the bill seeks to prevent potential evasion of accountability by those with violent criminal histories seeking to alter their identity.

Contention

Debates surrounding AB124 may center on civil liberties versus public safety. Advocates of the bill argue that it is a necessary measure to prevent offenders from escaping their past and potentially reoffending under a new identity. However, opponents might raise concerns about the implications for rehabilitation and the potential for stigmatization of individuals attempting to reintegrate into society after serving their sentences. Discussions may also delve into the broader impact of such laws on Nameless Rights, especially as they pertain to individuals who may have genuinely rehabilitated but now face restrictions due to their past crimes.