Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB127

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/25
• Refer: 3/11/25

Caption

The duty of a pharmacist to dispense lawfully prescribed drugs and devices. (FE)

Impact

AB127 introduces the concept of 'absolute contraindication,' which establishes a standard that allows pharmacists to refuse to dispense only in cases of severe or potentially life-threatening risks related to the prescribed drug or device. In cases where a pharmacist refuses to dispense a medication for reasons of conscience, the bill requires the pharmacy to transfer the prescription to another pharmacy that will dispense it without delay, thus ensuring continuity of care for patients. Additionally, the bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from penalizing pharmacists for dispensing drugs that may be prescribed for off-label use, thereby reinforcing patient access to necessary medication.

Summary

Assembly Bill 127 (AB127) aims to clarify and expand the duties of pharmacists in Wisconsin concerning the dispensing of lawfully prescribed drugs and devices. The bill mandates that pharmacies must dispense any lawfully prescribed drug or device without delay, eliminating previous detailed exceptions that allowed pharmacies to refuse to dispense based on a variety of factors. This change primarily focuses on ensuring that patients receive their prescribed medications promptly and efficiently, particularly in the realm of contraceptive drugs and devices.

Contention

The introduction of AB127 may raise concerns among certain groups about the implications for pharmacy practices and patient rights. Advocates for the bill argue that it strengthens patient access to healthcare and upholds the importance of timely medication dispensing. Conversely, opponents may express fears that the bill could lead to ethical dilemmas for pharmacists who object on moral grounds to certain prescriptions. The requirement to transfer prescriptions could also result in logistical challenges and delays if not managed effectively, sparking further debate on the balance between patient needs and pharmacy ethics.