1 | 1 | | 2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE |
---|
2 | 2 | | LRB-1013/1 |
---|
3 | 3 | | ZDW:cdc |
---|
4 | 4 | | CORRECTED |
---|
5 | 5 | | COPY |
---|
6 | 6 | | 2025 SENATE BILL 248 |
---|
7 | 7 | | May 9, 2025 - Introduced by Senators WANGGAARD, PFAFF, HUTTON, LARSON, FEYEN |
---|
8 | 8 | | and TOMCZYK, cosponsored by Representatives SPIROS, KAUFERT, ANDRACA, |
---|
9 | 9 | | BROOKS, DITTRICH, GOEBEN, MAXEY, MURPHY, MURSAU, O'CONNOR, |
---|
10 | 10 | | PENTERMAN, PIWOWARCZYK, SNYDER, SUBECK, KNODL and UDELL. Referred to |
---|
11 | 11 | | Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety. |
---|
12 | 12 | | |
---|
13 | 13 | | ***AUTHORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*** |
---|
14 | 14 | | AN ACT to amend 343.30 (1q) (b) 3., 343.30 (1q) (b) 4. and 343.305 (10) (b) 2.; to |
---|
15 | 15 | | create 343.301 (6) of the statutes; relating to: license eligibility and |
---|
16 | 16 | | restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices. |
---|
17 | 17 | | Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau |
---|
18 | 18 | | Under current law, if a person is convicted of a second or subsequent offense |
---|
19 | 19 | | related to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or |
---|
20 | 20 | | other drug, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or with a measurable amount |
---|
21 | 21 | | of a controlled substance in their blood (OWI offense), a court must order the |
---|
22 | 22 | | person[s operating privilege restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with |
---|
23 | 23 | | an ignition interlock device (IID). The restriction begins on the date of the IID |
---|
24 | 24 | | order and lasts for at least one year, but no longer than the maximum operating |
---|
25 | 25 | | privilege revocation period authorized for the refusal or violation. |
---|
26 | 26 | | Under the bill, the restriction of a person[s operating privilege under an IID |
---|
27 | 27 | | order must be extended by 180 days for each occurrence of any of the following |
---|
28 | 28 | | events detected by an IID: 1) three or more violations within a 60-day period, 2) |
---|
29 | 29 | | tampering with or attempting to circumvent the IID, or 3) removing the IID |
---|
30 | 30 | | authorization. |
---|
31 | 31 | | Under current law, a person whose operating privilege is administratively |
---|
32 | 32 | | revoked for a first offense of refusing a test may apply for an occupational license |
---|
33 | 33 | | after 30 days. The bill eliminates the 30-day waiting period and provides that a |
---|
34 | 34 | | 1 |
---|
35 | 35 | | 2 |
---|
36 | 36 | | 3 2025 - 2026 Legislature |
---|
37 | 37 | | SENATE BILL 248 |
---|
38 | 38 | | - 2 - LRB-1013/1 |
---|
39 | 39 | | ZDW:cdc |
---|
40 | 40 | | SECTION 1 |
---|
41 | 41 | | person may apply for an occupational license upon installation of an IID on any |
---|
42 | 42 | | motor vehicle that the person operates. |
---|
43 | 43 | | Under current law, when a person is convicted of an OWI offense, the |
---|
44 | 44 | | convicting court orders the person[s operating privilege be revoked. The length of |
---|
45 | 45 | | time for a court-ordered revocation increases with each subsequent OWI offense, as |
---|
46 | 46 | | does the waiting period before the person may apply for an occupational license. In |
---|
47 | 47 | | general, a person with prior OWI offenses may apply after 45 days. The bill |
---|
48 | 48 | | eliminates the 45-day waiting period and provides that a person may apply for an |
---|
49 | 49 | | occupational license upon installation of an IID on each motor vehicle that the |
---|
50 | 50 | | person operates. |
---|
51 | 51 | | The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do |
---|
52 | 52 | | enact as follows: |
---|
53 | 53 | | SECTION 1. 343.30 (1q) (b) 3. of the statutes is amended to read: |
---|
54 | 54 | | 343.30 (1q) (b) 3. Except as provided in sub. (1r) or subd. 4m., if the number of |
---|
55 | 55 | | convictions under ss. 940.09 (1) and 940.25 in the person[s lifetime, plus the total |
---|
56 | 56 | | number of other convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under s. 343.307 |
---|
57 | 57 | | (1) within a 10-year period, equals 2, the court shall revoke the person[s operating |
---|
58 | 58 | | privilege for not less than one year nor more than 18 months. After the first 45 days |
---|
59 | 59 | | of the revocation period has elapsed, the The person is eligible for an occupational |
---|
60 | 60 | | license under s. 343.10 if he or she has completed the assessment and, is complying |
---|
61 | 61 | | with the driver safety plan ordered under par. (c), and has installed an ignition |
---|
62 | 62 | | interlock device on each motor vehicle that the person operates. |
---|
63 | 63 | | SECTION 2. 343.30 (1q) (b) 4. of the statutes is amended to read: |
---|
64 | 64 | | 343.30 (1q) (b) 4. Except as provided in sub. (1r) or subd. 4m., if the number of |
---|
65 | 65 | | convictions under ss. 940.09 (1) and 940.25 in the person[s lifetime, plus the total |
---|
66 | 66 | | number of other convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under s. 343.307 |
---|
67 | 67 | | (1), equals 3 or more, the court shall revoke the person[s operating privilege for not |
---|
68 | 68 | | less than 2 years nor more than 3 years. After the first 45 days of the revocation |
---|
69 | 69 | | 1 |
---|
70 | 70 | | 2 |
---|
71 | 71 | | 3 |
---|
72 | 72 | | 4 |
---|
73 | 73 | | 5 |
---|
74 | 74 | | 6 |
---|
75 | 75 | | 7 |
---|
76 | 76 | | 8 |
---|
77 | 77 | | 9 |
---|
78 | 78 | | 10 |
---|
79 | 79 | | 11 |
---|
80 | 80 | | 12 |
---|
81 | 81 | | 13 |
---|
82 | 82 | | 14 |
---|
83 | 83 | | 15 |
---|
84 | 84 | | 16 2025 - 2026 Legislature |
---|
85 | 85 | | SENATE BILL 248 |
---|
86 | 86 | | - 3 - LRB-1013/1 |
---|
87 | 87 | | ZDW:cdc |
---|
88 | 88 | | SECTION 2 |
---|
89 | 89 | | period has elapsed, the The person is eligible for an occupational license under s. |
---|
90 | 90 | | 343.10 if he or she has completed the assessment and, is complying with the driver |
---|
91 | 91 | | safety plan ordered under par. (c), and has installed an ignition interlock device on |
---|
92 | 92 | | any motor vehicle that the person operates. |
---|
93 | 93 | | SECTION 3. 343.301 (6) of the statutes is created to read: |
---|
94 | 94 | | 343.301 (6) (a) In this section, XviolationY means a breath sample that is |
---|
95 | 95 | | above the alcohol setpoint of 0.02 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath or failure |
---|
96 | 96 | | to provide a passing breath sample within the 5-minute retest window. XViolationY |
---|
97 | 97 | | does not include a detectable breath sample that passes a test immediately |
---|
98 | 98 | | following a failed test or in response to a bypass or circumvention attempt. |
---|
99 | 99 | | (b) Notwithstanding sub. (2m) (a) and (b), and subject to par. (c), the |
---|
100 | 100 | | restriction of a person[s operating privilege under an order under sub. (1g) (am) 1. |
---|
101 | 101 | | shall be extended by 180 days for each occurrence of any of the following events |
---|
102 | 102 | | detected by an ignition interlock device: |
---|
103 | 103 | | 1. Three or more violations within a 60-day period. |
---|
104 | 104 | | 2. Tampering with or attempting to circumvent the ignition interlock device. |
---|
105 | 105 | | 3. Removing the ignition interlock device without authorization. |
---|
106 | 106 | | (c) The department may determine that a person did not commit a violation |
---|
107 | 107 | | upon receipt of verified documentation or other information satisfactory to the |
---|
108 | 108 | | department that is any of the following: |
---|
109 | 109 | | 1. Documentation or information, provided by the person within 15 days of the |
---|
110 | 110 | | notice of the violation, explaining why the person contends the violation was not |
---|
111 | 111 | | committed. |
---|
112 | 112 | | 2. Documentation or information, provided by the person[s ignition interlock |
---|
113 | 113 | | 1 |
---|
114 | 114 | | 2 |
---|
115 | 115 | | 3 |
---|
116 | 116 | | 4 |
---|
117 | 117 | | 5 |
---|
118 | 118 | | 6 |
---|
119 | 119 | | 7 |
---|
120 | 120 | | 8 |
---|
121 | 121 | | 9 |
---|
122 | 122 | | 10 |
---|
123 | 123 | | 11 |
---|
124 | 124 | | 12 |
---|
125 | 125 | | 13 |
---|
126 | 126 | | 14 |
---|
127 | 127 | | 15 |
---|
128 | 128 | | 16 |
---|
129 | 129 | | 17 |
---|
130 | 130 | | 18 |
---|
131 | 131 | | 19 |
---|
132 | 132 | | 20 |
---|
133 | 133 | | 21 |
---|
134 | 134 | | 22 |
---|
135 | 135 | | 23 |
---|
136 | 136 | | 24 2025 - 2026 Legislature |
---|
137 | 137 | | SENATE BILL 248 |
---|
138 | 138 | | - 4 - LRB-1013/1 |
---|
139 | 139 | | ZDW:cdc |
---|
140 | 140 | | SECTION 3 |
---|
141 | 141 | | device provider, indicating that a reported violation resulted from a malfunction of |
---|
142 | 142 | | the ignition interlock device for which the person was not responsible. |
---|
143 | 143 | | (d) The department shall develop an electronic process by which an approved |
---|
144 | 144 | | ignition interlock device provider may identify the start date of the restriction of a |
---|
145 | 145 | | person[s operating privilege under sub. (2m) and to provide to the department real- |
---|
146 | 146 | | time notice of usage and violations and a final compliance report. |
---|
147 | 147 | | SECTION 4. 343.305 (10) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read: |
---|
148 | 148 | | 343.305 (10) (b) 2. Except as provided in subd. 3., 4., or 4m., for the first |
---|
149 | 149 | | improper refusal, the court shall revoke the person[s operating privilege for one |
---|
150 | 150 | | year. After the first 30 days of the revocation period Upon installation of an ignition |
---|
151 | 151 | | interlock device on any motor vehicle that the person operates, the person is eligible |
---|
152 | 152 | | for an occupational license under s. 343.10. |
---|
153 | 153 | | (END) |
---|
154 | 154 | | 1 |
---|
155 | 155 | | 2 |
---|
156 | 156 | | 3 |
---|
157 | 157 | | 4 |
---|
158 | 158 | | 5 |
---|
159 | 159 | | 6 |
---|
160 | 160 | | 7 |
---|
161 | 161 | | 8 |
---|
162 | 162 | | 9 |
---|
163 | 163 | | 10 |
---|
164 | 164 | | 11 |
---|
165 | 165 | | 12 |
---|
166 | 166 | | 13 |
---|