Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

Wisconsin Senate Bill SB33

Introduced
2/12/25  
Refer
2/12/25  

Caption

Representations depicting nudity and providing a penalty.

Impact

The bill states that posting, publishing, distributing, or exhibiting such manipulated images without consent will be categorized as a Class I felony, especially when such actions are aimed at coercing, harassing, or intimidating the individual depicted. Furthermore, the bill retains the current Class A misdemeanor for unauthorized reproduction of private images that are intended for limited sharing. The introduction of these stricter definitions and penalties highlights a proactive approach to safeguard personal rights in the digital space and ensures that offenders can face severe legal repercussions.

Summary

Senate Bill 33 introduces significant modifications to Wisconsin's existing laws concerning representations depicting nudity, particularly focusing on the emergence of synthetic intimate representations, commonly known as 'deep fakes'. This legislation aims to enhance protections against the unauthorized use of a person’s image to create nude or sexually explicit content without consent, thereby addressing the growing concerns surrounding digital impersonation and non-consensual pornography. This legislation clearly defines what constitutes a synthetic intimate representation, which involves the use of technological means to manipulate an individual's likeness to create an intimate image.

Conclusion

As a legislative response to emerging technology and societal concerns about privacy, SB33 aims to set a legal precedent that recognizes and addresses contemporary issues of digital abuse. By clarifying the penalties associated with digital impersonation and non-consensual representations, the bill endeavors to empower individuals who are victims of such actions while also fostering a culture of consent and respect in the digital landscape.

Contention

Despite its protective intention, the bill may face contention regarding the implications of defining and prosecuting synthetic representations. Critics may argue about the challenges of distinguishing between legitimate uses of digital alteration and harmful exploitation. Additionally, there might be discussions surrounding the potential for abuse of these laws, wherein overly broad interpretations could inadvertently infringe on free speech and artistic expression. Moreover, as this bill may introduce new criminal penalties, it is essential for law enforcement and the legal system to adequately prepare to handle these types of cases efficiently.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3003

Relating to the appointment of counsel in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

HI SB854

Relating To Immigration.

WI AB33

Representations depicting nudity and providing a penalty.

AZ HB2604

Child and family representation; appropriation

HI HB1324

Relating To Landlord-tenant Disputes.

MD SB360

Revenge Porn - Definition of Visual Representation and Civil Action

CA AB340

Employer-employee relations: confidential communications.

VT H0193

An act relating to a child and parent legal representation working group