Wisconsin Senate Bill SJR15

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/7/25

Caption

Condemning the pardons and sentence commutations of individuals involved in the violent attack on law enforcement officers at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Impact

The resolution emphasizes the critical role of law enforcement in ensuring public safety and affirms the legislature's support for the Wisconsin State Capitol Police. In condemning the acts associated with the January 6 incident, SJR15 serves not just as a rebuke of the pardons but also aims to uphold the rule of law and the integrity of law enforcement. By unambiguously stating that assaults on police are viewed as attacks on society, the resolution seeks to reinforce a cultural narrative that prioritizes the protection of law enforcement officers, which may lead to increased public discourse on accountability for violent crimes.

Summary

SJR15 is a Senate Joint Resolution introduced in 2025, which seeks to formally condemn the pardons and sentence commutations granted by President Donald Trump to individuals involved in the violent attack on law enforcement officers during the January 6 Capitol riot. The resolution articulates the Wisconsin State Legislature's stance against any leniency shown to those who have assaulted law enforcement officers, thereby reinforcing a message of accountability for violent acts against the police. Senators and Representatives from both chambers co-sponsored this resolution, indicating a concerted bipartisan effort to address the issue.

Contention

Notably, SJR15 addresses a deeply polarizing political event, tapping into broader national conversations about the January 6 insurrection. Supporters of the resolution argue that it is essential to hold individuals accountable for their actions on that day and that any leniency undermines public safety and respect for law. Critics may view this resolution as politically motivated, as it responds to a highly charged issue in American politics. The language in the resolution resonates with ongoing debates about law enforcement, justice, and accountability, which could lead to divergent opinions among various community stakeholders about its necessity and implications.