Providing certain employees of the Highways increases in annual pay
The bill endeavors to amend the Code of West Virginia by establishing a clear mandate for salary adjustments that take precedence over any existing procedural frameworks governing state employees. This move is intended to facilitate timely pay increases necessary to attract and keep talent within the Division of Highways. Funding for these pay raises is to be sourced from general revenue appropriations, demonstrating a legislative commitment to supporting state employees despite potential limitations on available resources. The bill emphasizes that employees can still receive pay increases even if their salaries exceed the maximum allowable for their pay grade, which is a notable change within state employment practices.
House Bill 2117 introduces significant changes aimed at providing annual salary increases for certain employees of the West Virginia Division of Highways. The bill recognizes the ongoing challenges faced by the Division in recruiting and retaining regional field employees, suggesting that higher pay rates are necessary to enhance employee satisfaction and retention. The proposed salary adjustments amount to a total of three percent of an employee's annual salary, distributed over a three-year period. The increments are set to take effect in 2021, 2022, and 2023, ensuring a phased approach to salary enhancement for affected employees.
The general sentiment around HB2117 appears supportive among legislators who recognize the importance of investing in state employees, particularly in crucial roles such as those in the Division of Highways. Advocates for the bill argue that it is vital for maintaining a competent workforce responsible for the state's infrastructure, thus fostering community growth. However, potential contention arises from the implications this bill may have on budgetary allocations and broader state financial commitments, suggesting a complex debate around stateemployee compensation amid fiscal constraints.
Noteworthy points of contention regarding HB2117 center on its financial implications and the prioritization of salary increases amidst other budgetary needs. Critics may raise concerns about the sustainability of funding for these raises and whether they could divert necessary resources from other essential public services. Additionally, the lack of avenues for private causes of action in the enforcement of this bill could be viewed as limiting employee recourse, leading to discussions about the balance between legislative intent and employee rights in the public sector.