West Virginia House Bill HB3008

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/22
• Refer: 1/12/22

Caption

Prohibit the removal of a state government facility in a small community without an impact study

Impact

The bill's implementation could significantly alter how state agencies manage facility closures in small communities. Agencies would be required to provide a detailed impact study to local governments and make this information available to the public at least 60 days before any proposed closure. This adds a layer of accountability and encourages community engagement in the decision-making process, which is likely to affect the operational policies of state government facilities and their interactions with local populations.

Summary

House Bill 3008, introduced in the West Virginia Legislature, establishes a procedure for the closure of state government facilities located in small communities. The intent of this bill is to enhance transparency regarding such closures and to ensure that communities are adequately notified and consulted before a facility is closed. It mandates that a comprehensive study be conducted to assess the potential impacts of the closure on the community. This includes examining the necessity of the closure, effects on service availability, and overall impacts on the local populace, especially vulnerable groups such as senior citizens and those with disabilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB3008 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among community advocates and local officials who value transparency and community input in governmental actions. However, there may be concerns among state agency officials regarding the added administrative responsibilities and potential delays in the closure process, which could be seen as a drawback. This creates a delicate balance between community rights and operational efficiencies of state governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential pushback from government agencies that may view the requirements for extensive documentation and public hearings as cumbersome. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the criteria for defining 'small communities,' which could impact the applicability of the bill. Furthermore, the necessity for thorough cost analysis as part of the impact study might lead to disputes over funding and resource allocation for impacted areas.