West Virginia House Bill HB4002

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/22
• Refer: 1/13/22
• Refer: 1/21/22
• Engrossed: 2/16/22
• Refer: 2/17/22
• Report Pass: 2/24/22
• Report Pass: 3/10/22
• Enrolled: 3/12/22
• Passed: 3/12/22
• Chaptered: 4/19/22

Caption

Creating the Certified Sites and Development Readiness Program

Impact

By creating this program, HB4002 seeks to improve regional economic development strategies and streamline processes for local governments, allowing them to better attract investments. It mandates that governmental entities apply for site certification and improvement funding, thereby centralizing efforts to enhance economic infrastructures. The establishment of a Certified Sites and Development Readiness Fund is also a significant aspect of this bill, ensuring financial support for the initiatives outlined.

Summary

House Bill 4002 establishes the Certified Sites and Development Readiness Program within the Department of Economic Development in West Virginia. This program aims to enhance the developmental readiness of sites for economic development by setting evaluation criteria and certification levels. The bill outlines the process for site applications, progress evaluations, and reporting on readiness to promote investment in certified sites. Additionally, it introduces a matching grant program to provide funding assistance for site improvements targeted at enhancing their readiness for development.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB4002 appears to be supportive from economic development advocates who believe it will streamline development processes and foster greater investment. However, there may be concerns from smaller municipalities regarding their access to grants and the ability to compete for state funds effectively. The emphasis on state-level funding and criteria might lead to heightened scrutiny on how resources are allocated and whether smaller jurisdictions can navigate the application's complexities.

Contention

Contention might arise over the structure of the grant matching program, particularly regarding the maximum amounts available and the repayment stipulations tied to site sales or leases. Local leaders may express concerns about whether the grant funding sufficiently addresses their unique developmental needs or whether it prioritizes larger, more desirable sites for economic development. Additionally, the necessity to document site deficiencies and proposed improvements might create a bureaucratic burden that could deter smaller applications.