Altering the definition of an above ground storage tank
By redefining what constitutes an aboveground storage tank (AST) and adjusting the regulations around the inspection and maintenance of these tanks, HB 4083 could significantly alter the operational landscape for tank owners and operators in West Virginia. The proposed amendments could lead to a reduction in regulatory burdens for small tank operators, allowing them to potentially operate with fewer compliance requirements. Proponents argue that this will facilitate business operations and innovation in inspection methodologies, while detractors warn that it could compromise environmental protections and public safety standards.
House Bill 4083 seeks to modify regulations surrounding aboveground storage tanks in West Virginia. Specifically, the bill aims to amend definitions and requirements within the state's Aboveground Storage Tank Act. One major change proposed is the removal of certain location requirements for small aboveground storage tanks with a capacity of 210 barrels or less. This would exempt some tanks from Level One and Level Two regulations for one year, raising concerns about potential environmental impacts. The bill also includes provisions for promoting non-destructive inspection technologies, which aim to reduce the need for human entry into potentially hazardous tanks during inspections.
The sentiment regarding HB 4083 appears divided among stakeholders. Supporters, including some members of the business community, believe that reducing regulatory burdens can foster economic growth and innovation. Meanwhile, environmental advocates express deep concern that the loosening of regulations could lead to greater risks of contamination and environmental damage. The debate reflects a broader struggle between advancing economic interests and enforcing environmental safeguards.
The primary points of contention surrounding HB 4083 relate to the balance between regulatory flexibility for businesses and the imperative to protect public health and the environment. Critics emphasize that simplifying regulations could lead to mishaps or unsafe conditions, particularly if tanks are not routinely monitored as rigorously as before. They argue that environmental and health risks may be underestimated, especially concerning potential leaks or failures that could arise due to less stringent oversight.