West Virginia Senate Bill SB628

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/22
• Refer: 2/14/22
• Report Pass: 2/18/22
• Engrossed: 2/23/22
• Refer: 2/24/22
• Enrolled: 3/7/22
• Passed: 3/15/22
• Chaptered: 4/20/22

Caption

Supplementing and amending appropriations to Department of Commerce, DNR

Impact

The enactment of SB628 is expected to directly impact state laws concerning the funding and operations of the Department of Commerce and the Division of Natural Resources. By supplementing the existing budget, the bill allows for increased staffing and improvements in infrastructure related to natural resource management, including state parks. This is a strategic move to support conservation efforts and enhance visitor experiences as more funds are directed toward capital projects.

Summary

Senate Bill 628 focuses on the financial appropriations for the Department of Commerce, specifically the Division of Natural Resources (DNR) in West Virginia. It aims to supplement and amend the existing budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, by increasing funding for various items, including personal services and capital outlays for parks. The bill reflects a commitment to enhancing the state’s natural resources and related services by allocating additional public funds from the unappropriated balance remaining in the State Treasury. This financial infusion is intended to bolster the operational capabilities of the DNR.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB628 appears to be largely positive. The bill passed overwhelmingly in the legislature with 98 votes in favor and none against, signaling broad bipartisan support for funding initiatives that benefit the state's natural resources. Proponents likely view the supplementary appropriation as essential for maintaining and improving services that directly enhance the quality of life for West Virginia residents and attract tourism.

Contention

While the bill received strong support, some discussions may have raised concerns regarding budget prioritization and the adequate allocation of state funds. Potential points of contention could relate to how these appropriations are balanced against the need for funding in other crucial sectors. However, the overall approval without opposition suggests that such debates did not hinder the legislative process significantly.