Mandating coverage for medical care of State Police officers injured in line of duty
Impact
If enacted, SB76 will change existing state law to create a firmer obligation for the West Virginia State Police to cover the medical expenses incurred by its members due to injuries or illnesses that arise while they are on duty. This would establish greater financial security for law enforcement personnel by ensuring that medical costs resulting from work-related incidents are covered. Additionally, the bill allows for actions to recover costs incurred, thereby potentially relieving some of the financial burdens placed on the state from these medical expenses.
Summary
Senate Bill 76, introduced in the West Virginia legislature, seeks to amend the Code of West Virginia to mandate that the West Virginia State Police provide medical and hospital coverage for injuries or illnesses incurred by members while performing their official duties. The bill specifically targets support for members of the State Police, aiming to ensure that they have access to necessary medical services should they face health-related issues as a result of their work. The introduction of this bill highlights the importance of protecting those who serve in law enforcement, acknowledging the risks associated with the job.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SB76 appears to be generally supportive among law enforcement advocates and related stakeholders. Many view this as a necessary step towards ensuring that police officers are adequately protected and cared for, particularly given the dangers associated with their work. However, there are concerns regarding the fiscal impact of mandating such medical coverage, which could lead to debates over budget priorities in the state legislature.
Contention
While the bill has received support for its protective measures, there may be contention regarding how the mandated provisions will be funded and the implications for overall state budget allocations. Some senators and fiscal watchdogs might raise questions about the sustainability of such medical coverage requirements, particularly in light of existing budgetary constraints. The balance between providing necessary benefits for police officers and maintaining responsible financial governance could lead to significant discussions as SB76 moves through the legislative process.
Adds probation officers and parole officers to the definition of "police officer" for purposes of salary payments during line of duty illness or injury.
Police dogs; emergency medical services personnel authorized to provide medical care and transport to those injured in line of duty; immunity from liability therefor provided