West Virginia House Bill HB137

West Virginia 2023 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 8/6/23
• Refer: 8/6/23

Caption

Supplementing and amending the appropriations to the Department of Veterans’ Assistance

Impact

Should the bill be passed, it would positively impact the available funding resources for veterans’ programs in West Virginia. The additional appropriation is expected to enhance the Department of Veterans’ Assistance's capabilities to deliver services and support programs that cater to the needs of veterans, including healthcare and rehabilitation. The financial boost aims to directly benefit veterans and their families, addressing critical areas that may have been underfunded in previous budgets.

Summary

House Bill 137 is a legislative proposal aiming to supplement and amend the appropriations for the Department of Veterans’ Assistance in West Virginia for the fiscal year 2024. The bill seeks to allocate an additional amount of $1 million to fund specific services and needs for veterans, emphasizing the state's commitment to supporting those who have served in the military. The legislation reflects the government's acknowledgment of the importance of providing adequate resources for veteran care and assistance throughout the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 137 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among advocacy groups and stakeholders involved in veteran affairs. Most legislators consider the bill a necessary step towards ensuring the welfare of veterans, with sentiments expressing gratitude for their service. However, it remains to be seen how the appropriation will be viewed within the larger context of the state budget and potential competing priorities in other sectors.

Contention

While there has been substantial support for the bill, there may be discussions regarding the source of the funding allocation for the veterans' programs. Some legislators may raise questions about balancing budgetary constraints with the needs of veteran services, leading to potential debates over the appropriateness of the supplemental funding amidst broader fiscal responsibilities. Overall, the discussions around HB 137 emphasize the ongoing dialogue regarding state budget priorities and the allocation of resources to critical social services.