West Virginia House Bill HB138

West Virginia 2023 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 8/6/23
• Refer: 8/6/23

Caption

Supplementing and amending the appropriations to Miscellaneous Boards and Commissions, Adjutant General – State Militia

Impact

This bill's passage would have a significant impact on state budgeting and appropriations, as it reallocates previously unappropriated surplus funds to essential services under the Adjutant General's jurisdiction. By enhancing the funding for the State Militia, the bill aligns with broader state objectives to bolster public safety and support local and state emergency response initiatives. The funding adjustments included may provide necessary resources for infrastructure, training, and equipment for military efforts within the state.

Summary

House Bill 138 is a financial measure introduced to supplement and amend the appropriations from the State Treasury regarding public funds. Specifically, it addresses the General Revenue Fund for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, focusing on provisions for Miscellaneous Boards and Commissions, particularly the Adjutant General – State Militia. The bill aims to allocate additional funds to support military and related activities, demonstrating the state's commitment to maintaining adequate resources for its defense and emergency preparedness.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 138 seems to reflect a supportive attitude towards the necessity of maintaining strong military and emergency responses at the local level. Lawmakers appear to recognize the importance of adequately funding the Adjutant General's office, suggesting a broader consensus on the value of preparedness. Discussions among legislators generally highlight a proactive approach to ensuring that state resources are effectively allocated to support key areas of government responsibility.

Contention

While there isn't substantial evidence of direct contention discovered in the existing discussions, any bill related to budgetary adjustments often warrants scrutiny concerning prioritization of funding. Stakeholders may raise concerns about how these appropriations may affect other areas of spending, potentially challenging the balance of state budgetary commitments. Legislators must also consider the implications of possible future funding needs or changes that could arise from the adjustments made through HB 138.