West Virginia House Bill HB139

West Virginia 2023 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 8/6/23
• Refer: 8/6/23

Caption

Making a supplementary appropriation to the Department of Homeland Security, Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation – Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority

Impact

The bill has the potential to strengthen and enhance correctional facilities' infrastructures through targeted financial support. By allocating substantial funds to repairs, equipment, and new building projects, HB139 aims to address pressing needs within the corrections system and improve overall facility conditions. This funding could also lead to better rehabilitation services for inmates, which in turn, may reduce recidivism, enhancing public safety and community well-being.

Summary

House Bill 139 aims to make a supplementary appropriation from the unappropriated balances within the Treasury for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, specifically targeting the Department of Homeland Security, Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation – Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority. The bill supplements existing appropriation lines while introducing new items, including a significant allocation of $15 million towards buildings for the authority. Its primary focus is to ensure that the necessary funding is available for the critical operations of the corrections system in West Virginia.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment toward HB139 appears to lean positively, particularly among stakeholders within the corrections and governmental budgeting sectors. Advocates argue that the supplementary funding is essential to maintaining the operational capacity of regional jails and ensuring that facilities adhere to safety and rehabilitation standards. However, there may be concerns regarding budget management and the prioritization of funds, especially in light of other state funding needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB139 could revolve around the allocation specifics and the potential implications for overall state budgeting. Critics may question whether sufficient oversight is being applied to the spending proposed within this supplementary appropriation, while proponents would argue the necessary urgent funding justifies the approach taken. The amendment of existing appropriations to accommodate new ones also raises discussion about the state's fiscal priorities and responsibilities.