West Virginia Senate Bill SB1004

West Virginia 2023 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 8/6/23
• Report Pass: 8/7/23
• Engrossed: 8/7/23
• Enrolled: 8/8/23
• Passed: 8/14/23
• Chaptered: 8/29/23

Caption

Making supplementary appropriation to Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Parolee Supervision Fees and Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority

Impact

By supplementing appropriations in these areas, SB1004 directly influences the operational capabilities of correctional facilities and parole supervision efforts in the state. This might lead to enhanced monitoring and support for parolees, as well as improved conditions in regional jails. The proactive allocation of funds is seen as a necessary step in maintaining public safety and supporting rehabilitation efforts, potentially impacting recidivism rates positively if effectively implemented.

Summary

Senate Bill 1004 is a legislative act that makes a supplementary appropriation of public funds to the West Virginia Department of Homeland Security, specifically to its Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation. This bill aims to allocate additional financial resources to two critical areas within the department: Parolee Supervision Fees and the oversight of Regional Jail and Correctional Facility authorities. The intent of the allocation is to ensure that these divisions can continue to operate effectively and fulfill their responsibilities for the upcoming fiscal year ending on June 30, 2024.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1004 appears to be largely supportive among legislators, as evidenced by the unanimous vote of 31-0 in favor of the bill. This wide-ranging support suggests a recognition of the need for proper funding in corrections and rehabilitation services, areas often contentious due to budget constraints. Lawmakers seem to agree that without appropriate financial backing, the state's ability to manage parolees and operate jails would be severely compromised.

Contention

While there is support for the bill, underlying issues concerning budget allocations and the effectiveness of spending in corrections may arise. Skepticism could come from questions about whether the increased funding will translate to measurable improvements in parole supervision or if it will merely be absorbed into existing systemic inefficiencies. Additionally, as future fiscal needs evolve, there may be contention regarding the prioritization of funds toward corrections over other urgent state needs.