West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB2218

Introduced
1/11/23  
Refer
1/11/23  
Refer
1/13/23  
Engrossed
2/10/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Enrolled
3/11/23  
Passed
3/11/23  

Caption

Distracted Driving Act

Impact

If enacted, HB 2218 will amend existing traffic laws to introduce clear penalties for distracted driving. This includes fines, potential jail time, and license suspensions for repeat offenders or those causing accidents due to distracted behaviors. Additionally, signs will be erected at state borders to inform entering drivers of the law, signaling a proactive approach to prevent distractions caused by mobile device usage. This legislative change reinforces the state's commitment to reducing roadway hazards linked to distracted driving.

Summary

House Bill 2218, also known as the Electronically Distracted Driving Act, establishes comprehensive regulations aimed at reducing distracted driving incidents in West Virginia. The bill specifically prohibits the use of wireless telecommunications devices and stand-alone electronic devices while operating a vehicle, with exceptions for hands-free and voice-operated functionalities. By categorizing many electronic interactions as unsafe, the law emphasizes the importance of maintaining focus while driving to enhance public safety on the state's roads.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2218 appears to be largely supportive, as there is a general recognition of the dangers posed by distracted driving. Advocates for the bill argue that it is necessary for the protection of all road users and will lead to safer driving habits. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the practicality of enforcing such regulations and whether they may disproportionately affect certain demographics. Nevertheless, the overall position seems to favor the enhancement of road safety through legislative action.

Contention

Notably, there are debates concerning the enforcement of the law, particularly regarding how various exemptions might be interpreted in practice. Critics have questioned whether the law might lead to over-policing and potential misuse of law enforcement discretion. Additionally, concerns to protect driver privacy while restricting the use of communication devices have been highlighted, especially regarding the confidentiality of data stored on such devices. Such points of contention indicate the challenges that lie ahead as the law is implemented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB619

Provides with respect to the use of a wireless telecommunications device while operating a motor vehicle

LA HB771

Provides relative to the operation of a motor vehicle while using wireless telecommunication devices

LA HB580

Provides relative to the operation of a motor vehicle while using a wireless telecommunication device (RE SEE FISC NOTE LF RV)

LA HB376

Provides relative to the operation of a motor vehicle while using a wireless telecommunication device (RE DECREASE LF RV See Note)

LA HB229

Provides with respect to the use of a wireless telecommunications device while operating a motor vehicle

LA SB404

Prohibits use of a hand-held telecommunications device by a person when operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway. (8/1/20)

LA SB50

Prohibits use of a handheld wireless telecommunications device by a person when operating a motor vehicle upon any public roadway in this state. (8/1/20) (REF INCREASE LF EX See Note)

LA HB565

Provides relative to the operation of a motor vehicle while using wireless telecommunication devices (RE1 See Note)