To require that any municipality or county commission who intends to approve a location for a limited video lottery retailer must first announce their intention to do so and hold a public hearing before approval.
Impact
If enacted, HB 2299 would modify state laws governing local governance by explicitly mandating public announcements and hearings for video lottery retailers. This change would mean that community members will have the opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns before any decisions are made regarding the establishment of these retailers. It could potentially lead to more informed and engaged local populations when it comes to such establishments, which may affect local crime rates, community values, and economic impacts. The requirement for public hearings may also create a more collaborative decision-making process rather than one that is solely administrative.
Summary
House Bill 2299 aims to enhance transparency and public involvement in the approval process for new or existing locations of limited video lottery retailers by requiring county commissions and municipalities to announce their intentions and hold public hearings prior to approval. This measure seeks to ensure that local communities are informed and have a say in decisions that impact them, especially those related to gambling operations. The bill is positioned to amend the Code of West Virginia by adding a new section that imposes these requirements, promoting democratic engagement at the local level.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 2299 appears to be positive among advocates for community involvement and transparency. Supporters argue that this bill reflects a commitment to giving power back to local citizens and allowing them to express their concerns regarding gambling establishments in their neighborhoods. However, some may view the additional requirements as a potential hindrance to the swift establishment of new services or local economic development initiatives related to video lottery retailers, leading to a nuanced conversation about the balance between community input and economic opportunity.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding the bill likely focus on the potential delay in the approval of new video lottery retailers due to the added requirements for public hearings. Critics may argue that while public input is essential, it could be misused to block progress or lead to protracted discussions that undermine business interests and local economic growth. On the other hand, proponents might counter that such measures are vital to ensure that the voices of the community are heard and that local governance processes remain democratic and responsive to the needs and values of those most affected by the presence of video lottery operations.
Requiring that any municipality or county commission intending to approve a location for a video lottery retailer must first announce their intention to do so and hold a public hearing