West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB2784

Introduced
1/18/23  

Caption

Relating to duty to prosecute

Impact

The implications of this bill on state laws are significant. The requirement for prosecutors to maintain records of cases they decide not to pursue introduces a new layer of accountability, which proponents argue will lead to better case management and transparency in the judicial process. Meanwhile, the stipulated process for appointing special prosecuting attorneys is designed to address potential conflicts of interest or resource limitations, thereby allowing for a more robust handling of cases that might otherwise be neglected. This can facilitate effective legal representation across counties, enhancing the overall efficacy of the prosecutorial system.

Summary

House Bill 2784 establishes the mandatory duty of prosecuting attorneys in West Virginia to prosecute individuals accused of criminal acts, as well as stipulating their responsibilities when they choose not to pursue a case. This includes creating and maintaining a file for cases not prosecuted, which must be kept for a period of three years. The bill is aimed at enhancing accountability and ensuring that criminal cases do not go unaddressed, thereby reinforcing the role of prosecuting attorneys in the state's legal framework. In essence, HB2784 seeks to streamline the prosecutorial process and guarantee that cases are handled consistently and transparently.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2784 appears to be generally positive among supporters, who view it as a necessary update to the responsibilities of prosecuting attorneys that can lead to improved judicial outcomes. However, there may also be concerns regarding the practicality of enforcing the new requirements, particularly in counties with limited resources. Critics may argue that mandated record-keeping could add bureaucratic burdens to already overworked prosecutors, potentially impacting their capacity to pursue cases effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions about this bill may focus on the balance between improving accountability and creating additional burdens for prosecutors. Advocates may stress the importance of ensuring that all alleged crimes are pursued appropriately, while opponents could highlight challenges in implementing the new requirements, particularly in counties with fewer legal resources. Overall, HB2784 is likely to provoke discussions about how best to structure the prosecutorial role in a manner that fulfills justice without overextending judicial resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WV HB2956

CRIM LAW-ENFORCE&PROSECUTION

WV AB1418

City prosecutors.

WV HB4273

Relating to revising the criminal code generally

WV HB2527

Relating to revising the criminal code generally

WV SB451

Directing Prosecuting Attorneys Institute to make training available to certain new prosecuting attorneys

WV HB4006

Relating to revising the criminal code generally

WV H0613

Prosecuting Children as Adults

WV HB2401

Relating to revising the criminal code generally

WV AB2659

Juvenile records: inspection: criminal prosecution.

WV SB726

Relating to pre-trial diversion agreements and deferred prosecution agreements

Similar Bills

WV SB451

Directing Prosecuting Attorneys Institute to make training available to certain new prosecuting attorneys

WV HB4677

Relating to the reimbursement of sexual assault forensic medical examinations

WV HB3420

Relating to the reimbursement of sexual assault forensic medical examinations

WV SB675

Increasing reimbursement of sexual assault forensic medical examination kits

WV SB352

Modifying Unborn Child Protection Act

WV SB488

Providing Attorney General with non-exclusive prosecutorial authority over public integrity cases

IN HB1006

Prosecutors.

WV SB681

Clarifying that juvenile competency determination process extends to status offenders