To supersede all ordinances that restrict atv’s on paved roads
Impact
Should HB2929 be enacted, it would significantly reshape local traffic regulation by reducing the local governing bodies' ability to restrict ATV usage. This change implies that both municipalities and county commissions would lose the power they have previously utilized to regulate or ban ATVs on their roads, which could result in more ATVs being seen on local streets. Proponents of the bill argue that this uniform standard will enhance recreational opportunities for ATV riders by allowing them greater access to roads. However, critics express concerns over safety and road integrity, fearing that increased ATV traffic could lead to more accidents and damage to public roadways.
Summary
House Bill 2929 aims to amend the Code of West Virginia to eliminate the authority municipalities and county commissions currently possess to prohibit the operation of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) on municipal streets and county roads. This legislation seeks to standardize the allowance of ATVs on local roads, reversing previous restrictions imposed by local governance structures. Furthermore, the bill allows homeowners' associations to petition for ordinances regulating ATVs, but only if certain steps are followed, putting more emphasis on state-level provisions over local control.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB2929 reflects a division among stakeholders. Supporters, notably from the ATV riding community, perceive it as a victory for recreational freedom, enabling riders to access more areas without the hindrance of local restrictions. Conversely, opponents worry about the implications for public safety and the ability of local governments to address specific community needs effectively. The debate encapsulates a larger discussion about the balance of state and local authority, with strong feelings expressed on both sides regarding who should have the final say in transportation and safety regulations.
Contention
One of the primary points of contention raised in discussions about HB2929 revolves around the role of local governance in managing public safety and community standards. Opponents fear that removing local authority will lead to a lack of tailored safety measures that address specific hazards and conditions unique to different communities. They argue that local ordinances were designed to protect citizens and that state-level regulation can be too broad to effectively address local issues. In contrast, proponents argue that it streamlines ATV operation regulations and encourages the integration of these vehicles into broader transportation planning.
Preventing municipalities from targeting protected businesses with planning and zoning ordinances more restrictive than those placed upon other businesses.
Miscellaneous technical corrections made to laws and statutes; erroneous, obsolete, and omitted text and references corrected; redundant, conflicting, and superseded provisions removed; and style and form changes made.