Convention of states delegates have penalties for deviating from what they were sent to convention for
Impact
The introduction of HB 2931 marks a consequential development in the framework governing state involvement in federal constitutional conventions. If passed, it would institute stringent measures aimed at preventing delegates from acting beyond their mandates, thereby fostering a sense of accountability and responsibility among those participating in such conventions. This could potentially deter states from sending delegates to constitutional conventions due to the fear of substantial penalties, thereby impacting the state’s ability to influence constitutional amendments.
Summary
House Bill 2931 introduces significant penalties for delegates attending a convention of states who deviate from their assigned authority. The bill outlines harsh consequences, including immediate recall, substantial financial penalties ranging from $100,000 to $500,000, and potential imprisonment for up to 10 years. Additionally, any votes cast by such delegates would be rendered void, underscoring the bill's emphasis on strict adherence to delegated responsibilities concerning constitutional changes.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 2931 appears divisive. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to maintain order and accountability among delegates, thus protecting the integrity of the constitutional amendment process. Opponents may view the legislation as overly punitive, raising concerns about the implications for individual rights and freedom of expression during such assemblies. The strong penalties mandated by the bill could generate fear among delegates, potentially stifling open discourse during the convention.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding HB 2931 include the debate over the appropriateness of imposing such severe penalties on delegates who may diverge from their instructions. Critics may contend that the potential for significant fines and imprisonment could dissuade qualified individuals from participating in conventions, undermining democratic processes. The bill's proponents, however, would argue that clear boundaries and consequences are essential for a disciplined and purposeful convention, thereby ensuring delegates act strictly within the defined parameters of their delegations.