West Virginia Senate Bill SB507

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/27/23
• Refer: 1/27/23

Caption

Supplementing and amending appropriations to DHS, Division of Administrative Services

Impact

The passage of SB507 will have direct implications on the state laws governing budget allocations and appropriations for various state departments, particularly those linked to homeland security initiatives. By allowing for the reallocation of surplus funds, it gives the Department of Homeland Security greater flexibility in managing its budget and ensuring resources are available for programs like the Victims of Crime Act. This is vital in addressing state needs effectively, especially in times of fiscal constraints.

Summary

Senate Bill 507 is designed to supplement and amend the appropriations of public moneys from the Treasury for the Department of Homeland Security, specifically aimed at funding the Division of Administrative Services. The bill proposes the allocation of an unappropriated surplus balance from the State Fund, General Revenue, for the fiscal year 2023, ensuring that funds are available for vital programs and services. The bill outlines the financial specifics and the necessity for reappropriation of unexpended balances from 2023 for continued expenditures into the next fiscal year.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB507 appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for enhanced funding for public safety and security. Legislators recognize the importance of adequately funding initiatives that protect communities and aid victims of crime. However, there may also be subtle concerns regarding the management and allocation processes, which could lead to discussions on transparency and accountability in state budgeting practices.

Contention

While SB507 is largely viewed as a necessary step in ensuring state resources are effectively utilized, there remains potential contention over the prioritization of funding. Opponents might argue about the adequacy of distribution methods and whether funds are being directed to where they are most urgently needed. Further debates could emerge regarding the long-term implications of using surplus funds in this manner and the impact on future fiscal years and budget stability.