West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

West Virginia Senate Bill SB607

Introduced
2/13/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Report Pass
2/16/23  

Caption

Authorizing counties to increase special district excise tax

Impact

The enactment of SB607 is expected to enhance the capacity of local governments to fund economic development initiatives. By increasing the excise tax within specified districts, counties can better align their resources with the unique needs of their local economies. The bill facilitates a more robust economic framework by allocating tax proceeds directly to development projects, thereby fostering growth and attracting investment in targeted areas. This could also lead to improved infrastructure and services, contributing to overall community development.

Summary

Senate Bill 607 proposes amendments to the Code of West Virginia, specifically ยง7-22-12, allowing county commissions to impose a special district excise tax aimed at supporting economic opportunity development districts. This bill enables counties to raise the excise tax rate by as much as one cent on the dollar beyond the existing consumer sales and service tax rates. The primary goal is to generate additional tax revenue that can be used for economic development purposes within designated districts, which are geographical areas identified for such improvements.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB607 is cautiously optimistic, with proponents arguing that the enhanced tax authority will empower local governments to respond more effectively to the economic challenges they face. Advocates emphasize the potential for job creation and investment stimulation as key benefits of the bill. However, there are concerns from opposition voices about the implications of additional local taxation and the need for proper oversight to ensure that the increased revenue is used responsibly and transparently for community development.

Contention

Points of contention primarily revolve around the balance between enhancing local revenue streams and the potential tax burden on residents and businesses. Critics argue that while the intent is to foster economic growth, increased taxes could deter economic activity if not managed well. There are also worries about how the additional funds will be allocated and monitored, with calls for accountability measures to prevent misuse of the collected taxes. Ensuring that the benefits of the bill are equitably distributed across communities is another area of debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV HB3314

Increasing the special district excise tax to a rate or rates on sales within the boundaries of an economic opportunity development district

CT SB01458

An Act Concerning Changes To The Commissioner's Network Of Schools And Alliance District Programs.

NJ A1320

Requires each school district to annually submit interscholastic athletic opportunity report to the Commissioner of Education.

NJ A1147

Requires each school district to annually submit interscholastic athletic opportunity report to the Commissioner of Education.

NJ A3415

Requires board of education to directly employ certain professionals; permits board of education to contract for certain personnel; permits use of virtual or remote instruction for public school students in certain circumstances.

NJ S2333

Requires board of education to directly employ certain professionals; permits board of education to contract for certain personnel; permits use of virtual or remote instruction for public school students in certain circumstances.

CT HB07035

An Act Implementing The Governor's Budget Recommendations Concerning Education.

NJ A5378

Requires Commissioner of Education to establish matching grant program for certain school districts and schools using federal funds to increase instructional time and accelerate learning.