Allowing BOE to hire retired teachers to assist with tutoring
The bill introduces specific eligibility requirements for retired teachers wishing to serve as tutors, including proof of retirement, potential background checks, and liability insurance where applicable. It is important to note that county boards retain the discretion to determine the exact qualifications of tutors, allowing for some variation in implementation across different local jurisdictions. Moreover, the bill stipulates that participation is voluntary and dependent on the availability of county funds, meaning that counties can choose whether or not to implement this tutoring program.
Senate Bill 688 allows county boards of education in West Virginia to contract with retired teachers to offer tutoring services in reading and math. The purpose of this legislation is to provide students with additional one-on-one educational support, targeting those who need extra assistance in these core subjects. This initiative aims to leverage the expertise of retired teachers while addressing the growing demand for personalized education due to varying learning paces among students.
The sentiment surrounding SB 688 appears to be generally positive, especially among educators and advocates for enhanced educational support. Proponents view the bill as a valuable opportunity to utilize the rich experience of retired teachers, fostering a supportive learning environment for students. However, potential concerns have been raised regarding funding and the voluntary nature of participation, which may lead to disparities in access to tutoring services across different counties.
One notable point of contention is the provision that limits the civil and criminal liability of the county school board for actions taken by independent contractor tutors. This provision aims to protect educational institutions but may raise concerns among parents and community members regarding accountability. Additionally, the exclusion of tutors from state benefits and retirement impacts has sparked debate on whether such policy would discourage qualified educators from engaging in this tutoring initiative, potentially limiting the program's effectiveness.