Convention of states delegates have penalties for deviating from what they were sent to convention for
Impact
The proposed legislation would serve as a deterrent against potential overreach by delegates at conventions that can influence the Constitution. By establishing a legal framework that includes severe penalties, HB2398 aims to reinforce accountability among delegates, ensuring that they operate within the guidelines set forth by the state. This change could significantly impact the dynamics of conventions by limiting delegates' actions and potentially hindering flexible discussions necessary for effective constitutional amendments.
Summary
House Bill 2398 introduces significant legal repercussions for delegates representing West Virginia at a convention of states aimed at modifying the United States Constitution. The bill stipulates stringent penalties for any delegate who exceeds their authority, including mandatory recall, substantial fines ranging from $100,000 to $500,000, and potential imprisonment for up to 10 years. This legislative move seeks to ensure that delegates adhere strictly to the mandates given to them, accentuating the seriousness with which the state views participation in constitutional modifications.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB2398 appears to be one of cautious support among those who believe that accountability is critical in the governance process. Proponents argue that it is necessary to prevent any misuse of delegate authority that could lead to misguided amendments to the Constitution. Conversely, critics may view the bill as overly punitive, raising concerns about stifling open dialogue and the ability of delegates to adapt their positions as discussions evolve within conventions.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the potential chilling effect on delegates' willingness to fully engage in discussions at conventions, given the looming threat of severe penalties for deviating from their assigned tasks. There may be arguments regarding the appropriateness of such harsh consequences, with opponents arguing that it could deter individuals from accepting delegate positions and constraining the diversity of viewpoints that are vital at constitutional conventions. Overall, the bill sparks dialogue about the balance between accountability and the needs for open and adaptive constitutional discussions.
Relating to setting a date by which convention and visitor’s bureaus shall be accredited in order to be eligible for distribution of hotel occupancy tax proceeds.