West Virginia House Bill HB2589

West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/25
• Refer: 2/18/25

Caption

Relating generally to asphalt grindings or millings from any WVDOH Right of Way

Impact

The proposed adjustments in HB 2589 will centralize and clarify the procedures for disposing of asphalt grindings and millings that are not recycled for additional projects. By ensuring these materials remain the property of the Division of Highways until utilized or disposed of properly, the bill aims to prevent potential misuse of public resources. Furthermore, it prohibits contractors from selling these materials for profit, thereby encouraging beneficial recycling or distribution practices that could assist local communities.

Summary

House Bill 2589 aims to amend §17-2A-14 of the Code of West Virginia regarding the disposal of surplus materials, specifically asphalt grindings or millings, managed by the Commissioner of Highways. This legislation delineates the processes by which the commissioner may dispose of obsolete and unneeded materials. The bill mandates rules for the advertising and selling of such materials and ensures that their disposal adheres to sound business practices. It also requires the commissioner to maintain public inventories of these materials, which will be accessible for a specified duration before they can be destroyed.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 2589 have generally been supportive, recognizing the need for clear guidelines in the management of surplus materials. Proponents argue that the bill enhances accountability and environmental stewardship by ensuring that waste materials are disposed of in a controlled manner that aligns with public interest. However, some critics may raise concerns about the lack of flexibility in how local contractors might utilize surplus materials, suggesting that the bill might inadvertently limit valuable community opportunities for resource reuse or recycling.

Contention

Key points of contention may arise from the restrictions placed on contractors regarding the disposal of materials, particularly concerning resale or profit-making opportunities. While the bill aims to protect public assets, opponents may argue that it constrains local contractors' autonomy and their ability to leverage surplus materials to benefit the community. This potential overreach into local governance issues could spark debate on the balance needed between state regulation and local economic empowerment in the management of public resources.