James M. Ellis Memorial Road
This resolution underscores the importance of recognizing historical figures and their contributions to society, specifically within the context of West Virginia’s rich history. By naming this road after J.M. Ellis, the bill seeks to foster a sense of pride in local history and to educate future generations about the achievements of this prominent legal and civic figure. The impact on state laws is primarily symbolic, aiming for a greater awareness of diversity and inclusion in the recognition of state historical figures.
House Concurrent Resolution 22 (HCR22) is a legislative proposal from Delegate Pritt, aiming to honor the legacy of James Monroe 'J.M.' Ellis by naming a section of Greentown Loop Road in Oak Hill, Fayette County, the 'James Monroe Ellis Memorial Road.' This resolution highlights the significant contributions of J.M. Ellis, the first black attorney admitted to the West Virginia State Bar and a former member of the West Virginia House of Delegates. The resolution requests the Division of Highways to erect signs marking this portion of the road in his honor, ensuring that his legacy is remembered in the community.
The general sentiment toward HCR22 appears to be positive, emphasizing community values and historical acknowledgment. Supporters of this resolution likely see it as a necessary step in celebrating the contributions of minority figures in state history. In the conversations surrounding the proposal, notable support can be observed from individuals and groups focused on education, history, and civil rights, advocating for the recognition of those who challenged societal norms and contributed positively to the legal framework of the state.
There are minimal points of contention noted regarding HCR22 since the bill primarily centers on honoring an individual. However, discussions may arise surrounding the broader implications of memorializing historical figures, particularly concerning how such recognitions reflect on modern societal values and the ongoing conversations about race and equality in history. The resolution, while commendable in intent, invites discourse on how history is commemorated and who is considered worthy of such honors.