West Virginia House Bill HCR74

West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/25
• Refer: 3/4/25

Caption

To repeal the 17th amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Impact

Should HCR74 be enacted, it would significantly alter the electoral process for U.S. senators, shifting the responsibility from the electorate back to state legislatures. Supporters contend that this change would enhance the accountability of senators to their respective state governments rather than to the general public. They argue this would lead to a more cohesive representation of state interests at the federal level, promoting a federal structure that is more aligned with traditional state governance principles.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 74 (HCR74) urges Congress to call a convention of the states for the purpose of proposing an amendment to repeal the Seventeenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which mandates the popular election of senators. HCR74 emphasizes the authority of states under Article V of the U.S. Constitution to initiate such a convention, effectively advocating for a return to the previous system of legislative selection of senators. The proponents of this bill argue that the amendment undermines state sovereignty and limits the role of state legislatures in federal affairs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR74 appears to be mixed. Proponents, primarily from conservative and libertarian viewpoints, express enthusiasm for a move that they believe will revert to a system that respects states' rights and limits federal overreach. Conversely, opponents critique the resolution as a radical shift that undermines democratic processes. They argue that limiting the election of senators to state legislatures diminishes public participation in governance and could reintroduce potential corruption and favoritism.

Contention

Notable points of contention include fears regarding the implications of a convention of states, as some legislators worry it could open the door for unintended amendments to be proposed. Critics also highlight that the Seventeenth Amendment was enacted in response to widespread corruption and inefficiencies in the legislative selection process, suggesting its repeal may lead to a regression into past issues. The debate encapsulates broader tensions between state power and federal authority, with strong arguments on both sides regarding the best approach to governance.