West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

West Virginia Senate Bill SB644

Introduced
3/3/25  

Caption

Reinstating prevailing wage

Impact

The reinstatement of prevailing wage laws is expected to have significant implications for state contracts and the construction industry. By mandating that contractors pay at least the established prevailing wage rates, the bill aims to promote fair labor practices and support skilled workers. It also seeks to stabilize wages in the construction sector, which can help mitigate wage competition that could lead to a reduction in labor quality and standards. The bill will apply to all relevant contracts following its enactment, instating a policy that protects local workers and supports workforce development.

Summary

Senate Bill 644 aims to reinstate and regulate prevailing wage requirements for state government construction contracts. The bill will amend the Code of West Virginia by establishing guidelines for the determination and enforcement of prevailing wages on public improvement projects. Contractors will be required to ascertain and incorporate fair minimum wage rates into their specifications, based on local wage standards determined annually by the State Commissioner of Labor. This legislative effort seeks to ensure that workers in the construction industry receive fair compensation reflective of local wage conditions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB644 has been supportive among labor advocacy groups and certain political factions, which view it as a necessary step toward protecting workers' rights and promoting living wages. However, some opponents argue that reinstating such wage requirements could burden the state and taxpayers, arguing that it may lead to increased project costs. The debate centers around balancing fair compensation for workers with the financial implications for public projects and the state's budget.

Contention

Discussions around SB644 have highlighted concerns regarding potential opposition from those who feel that prevailing wage mandates could restrict competition among contractors, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers. Opponents of the bill stress the importance of flexibility for local governments and contractors to negotiate wages based on individual project circumstances. Additionally, there are concerns about the complexity of implementing and enforcing the proposed regulations effectively, as well as the potential impact on smaller contractors who may struggle to meet the strict requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA HB2450

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management, contract requirements.

VA SB1491

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management, contract requirements.

AZ SB1054

State construction project delivery methods

VA SB954

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management and design-build contracting.

VA HB1957

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management and design-build contracting.

VA SB249

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management and design-build contracting.

VA HB1108

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management and design-build contracting.

VA SB18

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management and design-build contracting.