West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

West Virginia Senate Bill SB692

Introduced
3/4/25  

Caption

Relating to requirements to receive PROMISE Scholarship

Impact

If passed, SB692 could significantly impact state laws governing higher education funding and scholarship eligibility. It aligns with initiatives to enhance student accessibility to financial support and to encourage performance in alternative standardized assessments. By expanding the test criteria beyond traditional metrics such as the SAT and ACT, the bill aims to promote equity in educational opportunities for diverse student populations across the state, particularly those who excel under the parameters of the CLT.

Summary

Senate Bill 692, introduced in West Virginia, seeks to amend the requirements for the PROMISE Scholarship program by including the Classical Learning Test (CLT) as an acceptable standardized assessment for scholarship eligibility. This inclusion is aimed at broadening the scope of accepted entrance tests, allowing students who perform well on the CLT to be eligible for the scholarship, thus potentially increasing the number of students benefiting from this financial aid program. The bill reflects a growing trend to diversify the criteria used for academic assessments in higher education funding.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB692 appears to be positive among educational advocates who support widening access to scholarships for students with varying types of standardized test performances. However, some concern exists regarding the implications for future educational assessment practices and the potential dilution of academic standards, as critics may argue that including multiple testing formats could lead to inconsistencies in evaluating student readiness for higher education.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential challenges and debates over the adequacy of the CLT as a reliable measure of academic preparedness for college-level education. Opponents of expanding scholarship eligibility criteria may express concerns about ensuring that all applicants maintain a consistent level of academic excellence. Additionally, discussions around the financial implications of increased scholarship awards may arise, particularly about the sustainability of funding within the PROMISE Scholarship program.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB5829

Higher education: financial aid; state competitive scholarships; eliminate. Amends secs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 of 1964 PA 208 (MCL 390.972 et seq.) & repeals acts and rescinds rules.

CA AB288

California Ban on Scholarship Displacement Act of 2021.

NJ S3566

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A3422

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A5181

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

CA AB3086

California Ban on Scholarship Displacement Act of 2020.

NJ A2528

Requires public institutions of higher education to provide student-athletes who lose athletic scholarships because of injuries sustained while participating in athletic program with equivalent scholarships.

NJ A919

Requires public institutions of higher education to provide student-athletes who lose athletic scholarships because of injuries sustained while participating in athletic program with equivalent scholarships.