Wyoming 2022 Regular Session

Wyoming House Bill HB0005

Introduced
2/15/22  
Report Pass
2/22/22  
Refer
2/22/22  
Report Pass
2/24/22  
Engrossed
2/28/22  
Refer
3/1/22  
Report Pass
3/2/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Report Pass
3/4/22  
Enrolled
3/9/22  

Caption

Wild horse and burro management.

Impact

The bill has implications for state law by clarifying the state's role in managing wildlife that strays from federal lands. It introduces mechanisms for cost recovery from federal agencies, potentially changing how states collaborate with federal entities regarding land management. The bill also provides a framework for cooperative agreements with tribes and other organizations to manage wild horse populations effectively, emphasizing the need for collaboration in environmental stewardship and resource management on shared lands.

Summary

House Bill 0005 addresses the management of wild horses and burros on nonfederal lands in Wyoming. It mandates that federal land management agencies be notified of the costs associated with wild horse grazing on state lands and seeks reimbursement for those costs. The bill further authorizes the state to pursue legal action to compel federal agencies to remove wild horses that stray from designated herd management areas. This legislation underscores the state's authority over land management issues concerning wild equines, particularly in cases where they negatively impact land resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB0005 appears to be supportive, especially among legislators concerned with local land management and the economic implications of unchecked wild horse populations. Proponents believe that the bill is a step toward responsible wildlife management and will benefit state financial resources. However, there may be contention regarding how these measures are implemented and the potential impact on wild horse populations, with concerns about animal welfare and ecological balance. Overall, legislative support appears strong based on the voting history, which passed with a majority.

Contention

Notably, the enforcement provisions within the bill may raise concerns among animal rights advocates and environmentalists. Critics may argue that the emphasis on removal and management tactics could lead to inhumane practices or accelerate population control measures that could harm the animals. Thus, while the bill aims to address land management issues, the approach to handling wild horse populations could lead to debates about ethics and ecological responsibility moving forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2724

In-home supportive services: provider wages and benefits.

CA SB496

Flood control: water development projects: Pajaro River.

TX SB1462

Relating to the creation and operation of certain local health care provider participation programs.

CA SB489

Flood management projects: state funding: Pajaro River Flood Risk Management Project.

CA SB246

Medi-Cal: graduate medical education payments.

CA AB489

Flood control: state financial assistance: Pajaro River.

CA AB1037

Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Hospital: clinics: licensure and regulation: exemption.

CA AB2450

Flood control: City of Woodland: Lower Cache Creek.