Wyoming Senate Bill SF0106

Wyoming 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/25
• Report Pass: 1/28/25
• Engrossed: 1/31/25
• Refer: 2/13/25
• Report Pass: 2/18/25
• Enrolled: 2/26/25
• Passed: 2/28/25

Caption

Motor vehicle dealer and manufacturer warranty rates.

Impact

The impact of SF0106 on state laws is significant as it modifies existing statutes concerning compensation for warranty work related to motor vehicle repairs. By allowing dealers the authority to submit proposed rates, the bill promotes a more competitive environment among vehicle dealers, which could lead to variances in service quality and pricing across the state. The inclusion of mediation and potential civil actions also adds a layer of oversight intended to ensure fairness between dealers and manufacturers.

Summary

SF0106, an act related to motor vehicles in the State of Wyoming, establishes new provisions for how new vehicle dealers can set their hourly labor rates and retail parts markup rates charged for warranty repairs. The bill aims to provide a structured procedure for dealers, allowing them to establish these rates either through mutual agreement with manufacturers or by following specified submission processes. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for mediation should disputes arise regarding the established rates, offering a legal pathway for resolution.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SF0106 seems to be largely supportive among vehicle dealers who see the bill as a means to increase their operational flexibility and autonomy. However, concerns have been raised regarding the balance of power between dealers and manufacturers, particularly regarding the potential for manufacturers to contest submitted rates. Stakeholders in the automotive industry have expressed a mixture of optimism about fair negotiations and wariness of overreach by larger manufacturers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the mediation process, which some fear may not adequately protect dealer interests against powerful manufacturers. There are also discussions on whether the established rates will truly reflect reasonable compensation for work performed given the potential for manufacturers to contest rates they find unfavorable. This dynamic raises questions about the overall equity in the relationship between dealers and manufacturers under the new framework, as well as the transparency of the rate-setting process.