Vaccines, employer-mandated COVID-19 vaccination, private right of action against employer for certain injuries or death resulting from
Impact
The enactment of HB29 will significantly impact state laws regarding workplace regulations and public health mandates. By providing a legal pathway for employees to sue their employers over vaccine-related health issues, the bill may create a more cautious environment for employers considering implementing mandatory vaccination policies. This legal framework could encourage employers to reevaluate their health and safety protocols in the workplace, balancing public health considerations with potential liability risks that may arise from enforcing such mandates.
Summary
House Bill 29 addresses the issue of employer-mandated COVID-19 vaccinations by establishing a private right of action for employees against employers. Specifically, the bill allows employees to seek damages for any adverse reactions, injuries, disabilities, or deaths resulting from receiving a vaccine mandated by their employer. It aims to empower employees to take legal recourse in the event that they suffer negative health outcomes directly related to employer-imposed vaccination requirements. Furthermore, the bill explicitly prohibits state recognition of certain federal vaccine mandates implemented after January 1, 2020.
Contention
Notably, HB29 has sparked considerable debate among legislators and the public, with proponents arguing that it safeguards individual rights and health autonomy against potentially harmful mandates. Supporters emphasize the importance of personal choice in health matters and advocate for employees’ rights to seek compensation for adverse reactions they may suffer due to employer requirements. However, opponents argue that the bill could lead to decreased vaccination rates, undermining public health initiatives aimed at combating COVID-19 and potentially creating a patchwork of health standards across the state.
To make it unlawful for a person to deny an individual full and equal enjoyment of public accommodations or for an employer to discriminate against an applicant or employee based upon the individual's weight or body size; state cause of action against an employer who does so created
To make it unlawful for a person to deny an individual full and equal enjoyment of public accommodations based upon the individual's weight or body size; to make it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an applicant or employee based upon the applicant or employee's weight or body size; and to create a state cause of action against an employer who does so.
Health; discrimination by certain entities against individuals who refuse certain immunizations, drugs, or facial coverings for reasons of conscience prohibited; civil cause of action for violations provided; Attorney General authorized to defend an entity subject to related federal penalties
Safe Drinking Water Act; environmental management department required to investigate for PFAS; private right of action against responsible persons established