Alabama Senate Bill SB299

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/22
• Refer: 3/8/22
• Engrossed: 3/29/22
• Refer: 3/29/22
• Enrolled: 3/31/22
• Chaptered: 3/31/22
• Passed: 3/31/22

Caption

Bullock Co., judge of probate, operation of the office of, provide special recording fee for documents in probate office, Sec. 45-6-82.21 am'd.

Impact

The impact of SB299 is particularly focused on local revenue generation within Bullock County. By increasing the recording fee and establishing a new issuance fee for vehicle tags, the bill is designed to provide financial resources for the operation of the probate office. This could potentially enhance the office's efficiency and service delivery, benefiting the local community by ensuring the office has the necessary tools and trained personnel to manage recording functions effectively. The bill could set a precedent for other counties considering similar measures to support their local probate offices.

Summary

SB299 is a bill concerning the operation of the office of the judge of probate in Bullock County, Alabama. The bill amends Section 45-6-82.21 of the Code of Alabama 1975, establishing a special recording fee for documents filed in the probate office and a fee for motor vehicle license tags issued or renewed by the office. Specifically, it increases the recording fee from $7 to $10 and introduces an additional tag issuance fee of $4. This legislative change aims to ensure that the probate office can fund necessary operational costs, including equipment upgrades and employee training.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB299 appears to be generally positive among local lawmakers, as evidenced by the unanimous support during the voting in the Senate with 21 yeas and no nays. This consensus suggests that legislators view the bill as a practical solution for enhancing the functionality of the probate office while adequately funding its necessary operational needs. However, the sentiment from the broader public regarding fee increases can vary, and some constituents may express concern or resistance to additional fees.

Contention

While the bill has achieved clarity in terms of operational funding for the probate office, potential points of contention could arise regarding the financial burden on residents faced with increased fees for public services. There could be discussions on whether the revenue generated through these fees is justified and how effectively it will be utilized by the probate office. Stakeholders from the public may seek assurances that these fees will translate into tangible improvements in service and accessibility to the probate office.