Relating to crimes and offenses; to amend Sections 13A-11-9 and 32-5A-216, Code of Alabama 1975, to prohibit an individual from loitering on a public roadway maintained by the state; or in the right-of-way of a public roadway maintained by the state; to provide criminal penalties for violations; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama 2022.
Impact
If enacted, the bill will specifically amend Sections 13A-11-9 and 32-5A-216 of the Code of Alabama, creating new crime definitions and potentially increasing local expenditures related to law enforcement actions. The bill provides a framework for law enforcement to address non-compliance through instructions to vacate the roadway, as well as offering alternative solutions like transportation to emergency housing. Such measures signify a more proactive approach towards maintaining societal order while potentially impacting the way law enforcement interacts with vulnerable populations.
Summary
House Bill 24 aims to amend the existing laws concerning loitering by prohibiting individuals from loitering on public roadways maintained by the state or in their right-of-way. The bill introduces specific restrictions on loitering with criminal penalties for violators, thereby redefining the legal framework around such behaviors in public spaces. Its proponents argue that these restrictions enhance public safety while addressing issues related to homelessness and other concerns associated with loitering in high-traffic areas.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB24 appears mixed. Supporters in the legislature, typically from more conservative backgrounds, view the bill as a necessary tool for improving public safety and reducing unlawful activities in public spaces. Conversely, critics argue that the bill could criminalize behaviors associated with poverty and homelessness, thereby exacerbating issues rather than resolving them. This indicates a broader social debate about the balance between enforcing public order and addressing the rights of marginalized groups.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the implications of criminalizing loitering. Opponents express concerns that the bill may disproportionately affect homeless individuals and lower-income groups who may have no safe place to gather. They argue that instead of providing support, the bill may lead to increased criminalization of poverty. Furthermore, the potential for law enforcement discretion in initial violations could lead to inconsistent applications of the law, raising ethical questions about enforcement practices.
Alabama Board of Registered Interior Designers, prohibitions on size and type of building they may work on removed, right to discipline non-registered individuals restored, exemptions provided