Relating to firearms; to amend Section 13A-11-72, Code of Alabama 1975, to further provide for persons prohibited from possessing a firearm; to prohibit aliens unlawfully in the United States or aliens admitted under a nonimmigrant visa from possessing a firearm; to provide a penalty for persons in violation of this provision; to make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022.
The implications of HB 64 are significant in terms of state firearm laws, enhancing restrictions around firearm possession. By prohibiting specific categories of people, the bill reflects a response to concerns over public safety, aiming to limit access to firearms based on individuals' legal status and mental soundness. Furthermore, the technical revisions made to existing laws are intended to improve clarity and applicability. In essence, the bill seeks to augment existing protective measures that restrict firearm access for certain individuals deemed a potential risk.
House Bill 64 aims to amend Section 13A-11-72 of the Code of Alabama 1975, focusing on expanding the categories of individuals prohibited from possessing firearms. The bill explicitly addresses aliens unlawfully in the United States as well as those admitted under nonimmigrant visas, preventing them from owning any firearms. This legislative effort aligns with ongoing discussions regarding gun control and public safety measures within the state. Additionally, the bill revises existing language pertaining to individuals' eligibility to own a firearm concerning convictions of violence or domestic violence misdemeanors, which Read A Third Time and Passed As Amended on June 6, 2023.
The sentiment surrounding HB 64 appears largely supportive among legislators seeking to bolster public safety through stricter firearms regulations. Advocates cite the necessity of preventing firearms from falling into the hands of individuals who may pose a threat to others, especially in light of rising concerns about violence in various communities. However, there are also opponents who argue the potential implications for lawful, responsible gun owners and advocate for alternative measures that do not negatively impact individual rights.
Notable points of contention in the discussions around HB 64 include the balance between public safety and individual rights, particularly concerning lawful residents and visa holders. Critics express concern over the stringency of these regulations potentially discriminating against non-criminal individuals who could lose their rights. There are fears the legislation might inadvertently criminalize lawful behavior under new, broader prohibitions without effectively addressing the root causes of gun violence.