Alabama House Bill HB147

Alabama 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/24
• Report Pass: 4/9/24
• Refer: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 4/16/24
• Report Pass: 4/30/24
• Refer: 4/16/24
• Enrolled: 5/9/24
• Passed: 5/17/24

Caption

Supplemental appropriations from the Education Trust Fund Advancement and Technology Fund to various school systems and colleges and universities, and other entities for fiscal year ending September 30, 2024.

Impact

The impact of HB 147 on state laws primarily revolves around its provisions for education funding, which enhances financial support for both local boards of education and specialized programs. The bill mandates the allocation of funds to public institutions, thereby reaffirming the state's commitment to improving educational infrastructure and access. This funding is expected to make a tangible difference in the operational capabilities of educational institutions, which may lead to richer academic offerings and improved learning environments for students throughout Alabama.

Summary

House Bill 147 represents significant educational appropriations for fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, allocating a total of $999 million from the Education Trust Fund Advancement and Technology Fund to various institutions. This includes $273.7 million to public institutions of higher education across Alabama, including major universities and colleges. The remaining $726.3 million is directed towards the Department of Education and specialized institutions, such as the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind and the Alabama School of Cyber Technology and Engineering. This funding initiative aims to bolster educational resources, support student learning, and improve overall educational quality across the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 147 appears to be positive among education advocates and institutions, as the bill provides critical funding needed to address educational needs statewide. Supporters view this as a proactive approach to ensuring that Alabama's students receive quality educational opportunities. However, there may be concerns regarding the oversight and implementation of these funds, particularly how effectively they will be equitably distributed among various districts and institutions, ensuring that less-resourced areas receive adequate support.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the administrative controls established within the bill, such as requiring prior approval from the State Superintendent for the expenditure of certain appropriated funds. While this structure aims to ensure accountability, it could also be perceived by some as a potential bottleneck that may delay necessary funding for local education projects. Stakeholders may engage in discussions about the balance of state oversight versus local control to effectively manage and utilize the provided funds.