Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1312

Introduced
1/27/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Report Pass
4/3/23  
Engrossed
4/4/23  
Refer
4/5/23  
Report Pass
4/5/23  
Enrolled
4/6/23  
Chaptered
4/11/23  

Caption

To Establish The Transportation Benefit Manager Act; To Regulate Contracts Of Certain Ambulance Providers; And To Regulate Claims And Prior Authorization Procedures For Certain Ambulance Services.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1312 would significantly alter existing state laws governing ambulance services and health benefit plans. By clearly defining the roles of transportation benefit managers and setting forth standards for prior authorization, the bill aims to streamline operations within the ambulance service industry and improve access to emergency care. It could reduce complications and potential delays in treatment for patients, thereby enhancing overall healthcare delivery in emergency situations. Furthermore, it reinforces protections for ambulance providers against delayed payments and ensures they cannot balance bill patients unnecessarily, promoting more equitable healthcare practices.

Summary

House Bill 1312, titled the Transportation Benefit Manager Act, seeks to regulate the interactions between ambulance providers and healthcare insurers. The law aims to establish a formal framework under which ambulance services are provided and compensated, particularly focusing on the processes for prior authorization, which refers to the necessity for healthcare insurers to authorize ambulance services before they are delivered. Specifically, the bill prohibits the requirement for prior authorization on emergency ambulance services, thus ensuring that individuals in need of urgent care are not delayed by administrative processes. Additionally, the bill outlines payment structures for ambulance services, ensuring that service providers are compensated promptly and fairly based on established fee schedules.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 1312 appears supportive, particularly among healthcare providers who have advocated for clearer regulations and improved reimbursement processes. Proponents argue that the bill addresses significant issues in the current system that can hinder timely care and result in confusion regarding insurance coverage. However, some concerns were raised regarding the regulatory burden on transportation benefit managers and the administrative changes required to implement these new processes. Nonetheless, the general atmosphere has been one of agreement on the need for reform in ambulance service regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1312 include the balance between regulating healthcare reimbursement processes and ensuring efficient and timely emergency medical services are delivered. Some stakeholders may worry that overly strict regulations on prior authorization could unintentionally complicate care delivery in other areas of emergency medical services. Moreover, the financial implications for insurers, particularly regarding the mandated reimbursement rates based on the Medicare schedule, have been a topic of discussion, with varying opinions on the effect this could have on insurance premiums and the sustainability of provider networks.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB651

Air ambulance services.

GA HB924

Insurance; discriminating against certain healthcare facilities and providers in connection with the administration of provider administered drugs; prohibit insurers

GA HB417

Insurance; prohibit insurers from discriminating against certain healthcare facilities and providers in connection with provider administered drugs

MA H1144

Relative to specialty medications and patient safety

MA S665

Relative to specialty medications and patient safety

MA S777

Relative to specialty medications and patient safety

GA HB448

The Medication and Patient Safety Act; enact

MA S655

Relative to telehealth and digital equity for patients