To Create The Right To Try Individualized Investigational Treatment Act; And To Ensure That Patients Have Access To Individualized Investigational Treatment.
Impact
If enacted, SB136 will amend existing state statutes to include provisions regarding individualized investigational treatments. This bill is particularly significant for patients who may already be vulnerable and desperate for hope in their treatment pathways. It offers these patients legal pathways to access potentially beneficial therapies that could extend their lives or improve their quality of life despite not having received wide regulatory approval. Furthermore, the bill creates legal protections for medical professionals and facilities that choose to provide such treatments, which may encourage more providers to offer investigational therapies.
Summary
Senate Bill 136, known as the Right to Try Individualized Investigational Treatment Act, aims to provide patients suffering from life-threatening or severely debilitating illnesses with the opportunity to access personalized investigational treatments that are not yet fully approved by regulatory agencies like the FDA. The bill establishes clear procedures that allow eligible patients to attempt to obtain these treatments, thereby giving them a greater degree of control over their health choices. This initiative is designed to facilitate access to potentially life-saving therapies for patients who have exhausted all other conventional treatment options.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB136 is largely supportive among patient advocacy groups and some healthcare professionals who believe that it empowers patients and provides them with hope and options in dire circumstances. Proponents argue that it extends patient autonomy and recognizes the right to try experimental treatments. However, some concerns have been raised about the implications of enabling access to unapproved therapies, including potential exploitation of desperate patients and the ethical considerations involved in informed consent procedures.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the responsibility placed on healthcare providers and facilities to offer investigational treatments and the legal implications of such actions. Critics are wary that the bill could lead to situations where vulnerable patients might be exposed to unproven therapies without adequate safeguards. Additionally, there are concerns regarding how this act interacts with insurance coverage for treatments, as the bill does not mandate coverage by health plans for individualized treatments, potentially leaving patients with significant out-of-pocket costs.
To Create An Income Tax Credit For Contributions To Certain Rural Hospital Organizations; And To Create The Helping Enhance Access To Rural Treatment (heart) Act.
To Require Emergency Veterinary Treatment Of Animals By Veterinary Practices And Veterinarians; And To Create The Animal Emergency Veterinary Treatment Act.
To Amend The No Patient Left Alone Act; To Require Outpatient Facilities To Comply With Visitation And Support Person Requirements; And To Add Penalties For A Violation Of The No Patient Left Alone Act.
To Enact The Arkansas Triage, Treat, And Transport To An Alternative Destination Act; And To Mandate Insurance Coverage For An Ambulance Service To Triage, Treat, And Transport A Patient To An Alternative Destination.
To Create The Universal Newborn Screening Act; And To Ensure That Newborns Are Screened For Conditions Recommended By The United States Department Of Health And Human Services.
To Amend "quincy's Law" Concerning Testing In Certain Investigations Under The Child Maltreatment Act; To Amend The Law Regarding The Right To Medical Records Under The Child Maltreatment Act; And To Declare An Emergency.