Senate Resolution 72 (SR72) is a legislative measure that requests authorization for Senator J. Dotson to pursue the consideration of Senate Joint Resolution 13 (SJR 13) as a third proposed constitutional amendment in the state of Arkansas. The resolution indicates that under Section 19(C) of the Joint Rules of the Ninety-Fifth General Assembly, a third proposed constitutional amendment cannot be voted upon unless identical resolutions are approved by a two-thirds majority in both houses of the General Assembly. Thus, SR72 sets the groundwork for SJR 13 to be formally considered and potentially placed on the ballot for voter ratification.
This resolution is critical in aligning the legislative process with constitutional provisions concerning proposed amendments. The significance lies in ensuring that any amendments to the state's constitution follow established rules, thereby maintaining orderly governance procedures. This structured approach to constitutional amendments is designed to prevent arbitrary changes and ensures that significant legislative changes receive adequate scrutiny and broad legislative support.
The potential implications of SR72 could extend far beyond its immediate administrative purpose. If SJR 13 is approved, it could lead to significant changes in the state constitution, which may impact various aspects of governance, law, and policy in Arkansas. Opponents of such amendments may argue that they can lead to complications or unintended consequences in the state's legal framework, highlighting a potential point of contention among lawmakers and constituents alike.
Overall, the passage of SR72 is a procedural step that enables the further consideration of important constitutional issues within the state, reflecting a commitment to following established legislative protocols while providing a pathway for proposed amendments that may address pressing legal and social matters in Arkansas.