Requesting That Senator King Be Authorized To Pursue The Consideration Of Sjr 6 As A Third Proposed Constitutional Amendment.
The authorization provided by SR73, if acted upon, will set forth a process whereby any proposed constitutional amendments require the consent of two-thirds of the members in both houses of the legislature prior to being presented to the voters. This structure is pivotal as it establishes a stringent requirement for constitutional changes, which can influence the pace and nature of legislative amendments at the state level. The bill underscores the checks and balances in the legislative process, ensuring that any significant alterations receive broad support within the legislative body before reaching constituents.
Senate Resolution 73 (SR73) proposes that Senator B. King be authorized to pursue the consideration of Senate Joint Resolution 6 (SJR 6) as a third proposed amendment to the Arkansas State Constitution. This resolution seeks to ensure that the proposed amendment can be forwarded for consideration by the electorate, given the stipulations laid out in the Joint Rules of the Ninety-Fifth General Assembly. The passage of SR73 indicates procedural movement towards addressing SJR 6, which aims to affect significant changes to state constitutional law, pending further legislative action and public input.
As there are currently no recorded votes or committee discussions surrounding SR73, it remains unclear if there are notable points of contention or support amongst lawmakers regarding this resolution. However, the nature of constitutional amendments often draws scrutiny and debate related to their implications on governance and state authority. The broader conversations surrounding such resolutions tend to reflect varying perspectives on legislative power, voter engagement, and the potential for constitutional change, which may become more pronounced as discussions around SJR 6 develop.