Arizona 2023 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1603

Introduced
2/1/23  
Report Pass
2/7/23  
Report Pass
2/13/23  
Engrossed
2/21/23  
Report Pass
3/13/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Enrolled
4/6/23  
Passed
4/12/23  
Chaptered
4/12/23  

Caption

Hospital; price transparency

Impact

The implementation of SB 1603 is expected to significantly influence state laws regarding healthcare billing practices. By requiring hospitals to publish direct pay prices, the bill aims to empower patients by enabling informed decision-making about their healthcare expenses. Additionally, the Arizona Department of Health Services is tasked with verifying compliance annually, further ensuring that hospitals adhere to these transparency requirements. Those facilities that do not comply are subject to civil monetary penalties, which underscores the seriousness of the regulation.

Summary

Senate Bill 1603, known as the 'Hospital Price Transparency' legislation, introduces measures aimed at enhancing the transparency of hospital pricing for healthcare services in Arizona. It mandates that healthcare facilities disclose the direct pay prices for commonly used diagnosis-related groups and outpatient service codes. Facilities with over fifty inpatient beds are required to provide this information for their fifty most utilized services, while smaller facilities must do so for at least thirty-five. Moreover, hospitals must comply with existing federal regulations regarding pricing disclosure and face penalties for noncompliance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1603 appears to largely be positive from consumer advocacy groups and patients, as the law is designed to benefit individuals seeking healthcare by making pricing more accessible and understandable. Proponents argue that increased transparency can lead to reduced healthcare costs and competition among facilities. However, concerns have been raised about how this bill might affect smaller healthcare providers and their ability to manage complex billing scenarios, particularly in terms of maintaining financial viability amidst the operational changes required by the new law.

Contention

There are notable points of contention regarding SB 1603, particularly around the exemptions it provides to certain facilities, such as military hospitals and the Arizona State Hospital. Critics argue that these exemptions could leave many consumers without the necessary price transparency in vital sectors of healthcare. Moreover, the balance between transparency and operational feasibility for hospitals, especially smaller ones, remains a discussion point, as they may struggle with the administrative burden of compliance while continuing to provide a full range of services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1402

Health care; costs; reimbursement

AZ SB1088

Physicians; naturopathic medicine

VA HB2354

Health care provider panels; changes to provisions related to continuity of care.

VA SB87

Health insurance provider panels; incentives for mental health services.

MS SB2622

Mississippi Prior Authorization Reform Act; enact.

VA HB912

Continuity of care; Bureau of Insurance to convene work group regarding care.

IL HB4931

INS-NONPARTICIPATING PROVIDERS

IL SB3307

INS-NONPARTICIPATING PROVIDERS