Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2113

Introduced
1/8/24  
Report Pass
1/22/24  
Introduced
1/8/24  
Report Pass
1/29/24  
Report Pass
1/22/24  
Engrossed
2/6/24  
Report Pass
1/29/24  
Report Pass
2/27/24  
Engrossed
2/6/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Report Pass
2/27/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  
Passed
3/29/24  
Passed
3/29/24  
Chaptered
3/29/24  

Caption

Medical assistants; scope of practice

Impact

The legislation is intended to streamline operations in medical offices by allowing medical assistants to take on a wider range of responsibilities, thereby potentially improving efficiency in patient care. By formalizing what medical assistants can do, the bill aims to enhance the utilization of their skills while ensuring they operate under professional supervision. Notably, the bill also establishes training requirements that programs must meet to ensure medical assistants are adequately prepared for their roles, which could lead to a more competent workforce in healthcare settings.

Summary

House Bill 2113 amends section 32-1456 of the Arizona Revised Statutes to expand the scope of practice for medical assistants. The bill specifically outlines the tasks that medical assistants can perform under the direct supervision of a licensed medical professional, such as doctors and nurse practitioners, including taking specimens and administering injections. It clarifies the responsibilities and capabilities of medical assistants, seeking to provide a more defined operational framework for the role within healthcare settings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2113 appears to be largely supportive, particularly from healthcare professionals who recognize the necessity of clear guidelines for medical assistants. Advocates view the bill as a positive step in recognizing and formalizing the important role medical assistants play in enhancing healthcare delivery. However, there may also be concerns around ensuring that adequate training programs are in place to maintain the quality of care and oversight necessary for patient safety.

Contention

A notable point of contention may stem from the direct supervision requirement outlined in the bill, which some might argue could limit the autonomy of medical assistants. While supporters believe that oversight is essential for maintaining high care standards, some critics may view it as a constraint on the evolving role of medical assistants. Further discussions may arise regarding the adequacy of the training programs required by the bill and how these will be implemented across various healthcare facilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ HB2046

Juror information; master jury list

AZ HB2887

Peremptory challenges; criminal actions

AZ HB2081

Cremation.

Similar Bills

CA AB1368

Health professionals: authorization forms.

CA AB1490

Medical assistants.

CA AB1560

Nurse practitioners: certified nurse-midwives: physician assistants: physician and surgeon supervision.

CA SB554

Nurse practitioners: physician assistants: buprenorphine.

CA AB608

Medical assistants.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

RI H5256

Provides for equal pay for healthcare providers.

MD HB722

Physician Assistants - Parity With Other Health Care Practitioners (Physician Assistant Parity Act of 2023)