Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2316

Introduced
1/17/24  
Report Pass
2/6/24  
Introduced
1/17/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Report Pass
2/6/24  
Engrossed
3/12/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Engrossed
3/12/24  
Report Pass
3/25/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Report Pass
3/25/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Passed
4/8/24  
Passed
4/8/24  
Chaptered
4/8/24  

Caption

Mobile home; relocation; building codes

Impact

The bill's impact on state law revolves around enhancing tenant protections for mobile home residents within Arizona. By instituting a structured relocation fund and setting specific conditions under which tenants can claim expenses, HB 2316 addresses the challenges posed by rising rents in mobile home parks. This amendment encourages accountability from landlords regarding notification procedures and financial support for tenants, potentially reducing homelessness among mobile home residents adversely affected by these changes.

Summary

House Bill 2316 proposes amendments to sections 33-1476.04 and 33-1476.05 of the Arizona Revised Statutes concerning the relocation of mobile homes. The bill aims to establish protocols for tenants in mobile home parks facing significant rent increases or changes in community use from age-restricted to all-age communities. Specifically, it introduces provisions that allow tenants to receive compensation for relocation expenses when facing substantial rent hikes or community designation changes, thereby protecting their rights amid evolving housing regulations.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding HB 2316 seems to be supportive among tenant advocacy groups and those concerned about housing affordability. Advocates argue that providing financial support for relocation helps safeguard vulnerable populations, particularly the elderly and low-income families, who may be disproportionately affected by rent hikes. Conversely, some landlord groups may express concerns about the added financial burdens imposed on property owners due to these requirements, highlighting a potential conflict between tenant protections and landlord business interests.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the adequacy of the proposed compensation amounts and the procedural requirements imposed on landlords. While the bill establishes a cap for relocation payments, critics may argue that the set figures do not sufficiently cover the actual costs incurred by tenants during their move. Additionally, the requirement for landlords to formally notify tenants about rent increases or community changes could be seen as an administrative burden, leading to debates about the balance of responsibility between property owners and tenant rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2381

Mobile homes; recreational vehicles; fund

CA AB896

Registered Dispensing Opticians: Dispensing Opticians Fund: Optometry Fund: mobile optometric offices.

NV AB458

Revises provisions governing energy. (BDR 58-228)

CA AB3184

California State Board of Optometry.

NV AB38

Revises various provisions relating to housing. (BDR 43-521)

CA AB1534

California State Board of Optometry: optometry: opticianry.

CA AB1802

State Board of Optometry: optometrists: dispensing opticians.

CA SB1380

Maintenance of the codes.