Arizona 2024 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2325 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 02/21/2024

                      	HB 2325 
Initials EB/BSR 	Page 1 	House Engrossed 
 
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
Fifty-sixth Legislature 
Second Regular Session 
House: LARA DP 7-2-0-0 
 
HB 2325: backyard fowl; regulation; prohibition 
Sponsor: Representative Payne, LD 27 
House Engrossed 
Overview 
Prohibits a municipality or county from adopting a zoning ordinance that restricts a resident 
of a single-family detached residence from keeping fowl in their backyard . Allows 
municipalities and counties to establish certain requirements for keeping fowl.  
History 
Municipalities and towns have the general power to adopt and enforce zoning ordinances that 
regulate certain aspects of land use (A.R.S. §§ 9-240, 9-499.01, 9-462.01). 
Some Arizona cities have adopted ordinances to regulate how many backyard fowl may be 
kept at a residence and the conditions in which these animals may be kept:  
1) In Phoenix, poultry may be kept in an enclosure within 80 feet of a residence if written 
permission is given by each lawful occupant and owner of a residence within 80 feet 
of the enclosure;  
2) In Chandler, up to five chickens per yard are allowed if the coop is set back at least 
five feet from all property lines; 
3) In Scottsdale, fowl is allowed unless it is a frequent or habitual nuisance that disturbs 
a neighborhood or any two or more persons; 
4) In Flagstaff, small livestock such as chickens, ducks, rabbits, miniature goats and 
bees are allowed on residential or educational property. Unless the property is located 
in Estate and Rural Residential zoning, a permit is required to keep backyard 
livestock. On property less than 20,000 square feet, up to 5 chickens are allowed 
provided that they are fenced in to keep them on the owner's property and have at 
least 10 square feet of outdoor space and 4 square feet of indoor space; and 
5) In Tucson, residents may keep up to 24 chickens if they have an enclosure that is not 
within 50 feet of the dwelling of another person. Coops must be kept in a clean and 
sanitary condition. 
Counties have a similar power to adopt and enforce such ordinances. In 2017, the Pima 
County Board of Supervisors approved a zoning change to allow residents to keep up to 8 
hens in certain properties that are usually 6,000 to 8,000 square feet in size. Single-family 
dwelling lots and manufactured home lots of 6,000 square feet or smaller or multi-family 
dwellings could keep up to four hens per dwelling (A.R.S. §§ 11-251.05, 11-811) (Pima County 
Ordinance 2017- 36). 
 
 
 
    	HB 2325 
Initials EB/BSR 	Page 2 	House Engrossed 
Provisions 
1. Prohibits a municipality or county from adopting a law, ordinance or regulation that 
restricts a resident of a single-family detached residence that is one-acre or smaller in 
size from keeping fowl in the property's backyard. (Sec.1 and 2) 
2. Allows a municipality or county to: 
a) restrict the number of fowl that a resident may keep in the property's backyard to no 
more than six; 
b) prohibit a resident from keeping male fowl, including roosters; 
c) require fowl to be kept in an enclosure in the rear or side of the yard at least 15 feet 
from a neighboring property and with a maximum size of 200 square feet and a 
maximum height of 8 feet; 
d) require the enclosure to be maintained and manure picked up , disposed of or 
composted at least twice weekly; 
e) require that composted manure be kept in a way that prevents migration of insects; 
f) require water resources with adequate overflow drainage; 
g) require that feed be stored in insect-proof and rodent-proof containers; and 
h) prohibit fowl from running at large. (Sec. 1 and 2) 
3. States that the property rights of property owners in Arizona are of statewide concern. 
(Sec. 1 and 2) 
4. Preempts local laws, ordinances and charter provisions. (Sec. 1 and 2) 
5. Defines fowl to mean a cock or hen of the domestic chicken. (Sec. 1 and 2) 
☐ Prop 105 (45 votes)     ☐ Prop 108 (40 votes)      ☐ Emergency (40 votes) ☐ Fiscal Note